Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
721 days ago.
by Kendall78
Kendall78
#1

LtTE Overreactions

There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

No one is questioning his right to write a letter to the editor. We are merely exercising our right to point out what we see as flaws in his arguments.

Posted 1002 days ago.

Mr. Brandt has the same right to write over the line stuff as you lefties constantly do.

And your Fox News criticism is wasted hot air. Just saw on Drudge that CNN and MSNBC have lost half their viewers. Fox News is doing great. People are tired of just hearing one side of the news.

Posted 1003 days ago.

Kendall78

Makes one wonder doesn't it Myth?

Posted 1003 days ago.

mythravere

Dang I wonder what ever happened to TinFoilHat?

Posted 1003 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 1004 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 1004 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 1004 days ago.

Letters to the Editor this week had so much in common. No sense, no importance, and nothing of value. Actually when I saw the first two, I said "Where is PR" ,and lo and behold, there he was. Three very predictable and disgusting socialist rantings.

Posted 1005 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired- well...the letter he was commenting about was a bit out there.

Posted 1005 days ago.

Kendall78

Ah..see, I knew someone would send a letter addressing the foolishness of that letter last week: "Lies need to be challenged" by Ralph Chambers

Posted 1005 days ago.

Kendall78

I suppose this answers the question if you ever write many letters to the editor. That answer is a resounding no.

Posted 1006 days ago.

Kendall78

What's childish about it? It's as fake as your other screen name and makes just as much sense.

Watch that thin skin lad..it seems to break easily.

But since I hurt you, I apologize and will try this again.

Do you understand the letter to the editor policies? You are not suppose to write more than a certain number of letters in a given amount of time.

Posted 1007 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't think Kendall's afraid to call out somebody. I say this because he's not afraid to attach his name to his posts.

I call that taking responsibility.

Posted 1008 days ago.

Kendall78

Do you understand the letter to the editor policies R1krap? You are not suppose to write more than a certain number of letters in a given amount of time.

Posted 1008 days ago.

Kendall78

I don't like MSNBC at all. I am a realist Ithink.

I have no problem with a person saying Obama lied in regards to Obamacare. I think he did at some level. But when you start saying he lied because of Muslim connections or other bs...then that person should be called out.

Posted 1009 days ago.

You should apply for a talking head job on MSNBC, Kendall. You could all go around with your heads in the mud.

Posted 1009 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired- you are welcome to interpret the verse and the use by Brant as you see fit. I simply see it as silly to apply that specific verse and its implications to Obama.

Posted 1009 days ago.

Kendall78

Sadly...it is the Fringe Right that would be more welcoming of the verse to be aimed at them. They have openly lied about many things in regards to Obama and show no shame in it.

But this to wouldn't be appropriate because when one uses Biblical verses to justify political points of view...it's quite silly.

I think the writer of the letter and those that deal in destroying other people's character should focus on John 13:34 and IJohn the 4th chapter.

Posted 1009 days ago.

Kendall78

Are you a theologian?

A great deal of that chapter involves Jesus expalining who he is and his connection to God. Since Judaism believes that the Lord God is One, the notion of God having a "son" in the literal clashed.

Basically when questioned by the Pharisee and other in the Temple, Jesus told them that if they were of God they would realize the truth in who he was. But since they did not understand, then their understanding comes from another source other than God...ergo..the devil.

The verse and chapter has nothing to do with politics but everything to do with Jesus justifying himself as of the Father.

Posted 1009 days ago.

Kendall78

I've read the Bible from cover to cover..I know what it says but how the writer of the letter utilized that verse is what is important in the discussion, not how the writers of the gospels meant it to be used.

Posted 1009 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or