Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

I called for individual responsibility, not political action.

When we wait for politicians to act on known threats, we cede power to the government. When we take personal responsibility, we keep our freedoms.

Posted 169 days ago.

Stillhere

"this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing"

Posted 169 days ago.

harryanderson

Perhaps some of those who invited Benjamin Netanyahu to address Congress don’t realize he supports the scientific consensus. At the Copenhagen Summit, Israel agreed to reduce CO2 emissions 20% by 2020. Netanyahu said:

“…the threat of climate change is no less menacing than the security threats that we face. I intend to act determinedly in this field. In a country that suffers from a severe water shortage, this is an existential struggle.”

htt p://w ww.jpost.co m/Enviro-Tech/Cabinet-okays-NIS-22b-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases

The US military has also labeled global warming a security threat. Those who seek to lessen the security threat to Israel and America will lower their carbon emissions.

Let us take personal responsibility and “act determinedly in this field.”

It’s a matter of patriotism.

Posted 169 days ago.

Stillhere

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

Joseph Goebbels Nazi propaganda minister

Posted 170 days ago.

harryanderson

Of course, the truth that upsets them the most is the overwhelming scientific consensus. It really galls them that, according to figures quoted by stillhere, only one paper out of every 143 agreed with them.

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

Lesson over for today, please stack your books neatly on your desk

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

Of course the favorite lie amongst them all is the 97% one. Only in their minds does 97% of 32% equal consensus of anything but as you can see, the TRUTH comes in a distant second to the agenda.

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

"this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing" Its quite clear that the motivation is two fold, the agenda and good old cash. Pretty simple really and I APPLAUD Ms Kopacz for her honesty albeit quite rare

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

Of course these "exagerations" are parroted by frauds like our local republican slave to science Harry,

Case in point, He claims 2014 hottest ever.

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

The there are the "scientists" WHY you may ask would they lie? Lets ask Monika Kopacz Head of the NOAA climate project shall we?

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

But WHY you may ask do these people deliberately mislead (lie). Most of them are nothing more than left wing socialists like our dear fraudulent fellow Harry. You recall him, our local republican slave to science? yeah that one.

Posted 170 days ago.

harryanderson

97% of the most-published and most-reviewed climate scientists have reached a consensus.

These scientists have made their work known and subjected it to scrutiny.

Will you follow their example and subject your work to scrutiny? What are you afraid of?

Frauds refuse to disclose their sources. Are you a fraud?

Posted 170 days ago.

harryanderson

Do we get to check the credibility of your source, or does it come from an anonymous internet poster with a history of misrepresenting the work of climate scientists?

I'm trying to figure out whether your information is credible. Who paid for it?

Posted 170 days ago.

harryanderson

From where did you copy that post, stillhere?

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

preach on brother there are souls to win and money to be made.

Posted 170 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Inconveniant facts aren't the trolls friend !

Posted 170 days ago.

harryanderson

Stillhere, you posted:

"Out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That’s less than one percent, not 97 percent. Moreover, as we reported, the Cook study was flawed from the beginning, using selection parameters designed to weight the outcome in favor of the alarmist position."

I'd like to check the credibility of your source. From where did you copy this?

Posted 170 days ago.

Ohwiseone

What an absolute lying fool !

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

Do you guys were ceremonial robes? I imagine them to be green robes but have a nice red lining inside?

Posted 170 days ago.

Stillhere

Much like Catholics that see the Virgin Mary in toast etc, you guys see global warming in snow, rain drougt hot cold well any weather. It's delusional yes but shows an impressive ability to constantly reinvent your doctrine on the fly

Posted 170 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or