Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"EPA's Leading Climate Change Expert Pleads Guilty to Elaborate Fraud"

But not to what I posted...you failed there Tired.

"The EPA's Agenda: Undermine Capitalism and America"

No evidence and even the claim has nothig to do with what I posted...another fail.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

If everyone who was a member of the church of climatology would just lead by example, we would be skiing in July by next year.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

Mod, keeping up with you would involve an lengthy stop and wait on my part, getting any eggs?

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

Global temperatures are essentially the same today as they were in 1995, when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were merely 360 ppm. Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rose 10 percent between 1995 and 2012, yet global temperatures did not rise at all. Global warming activists are having a difficult time explaining the ongoing disconnect between atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures.

Posted 9 days ago.

moderation

tired- try to keep up, as you have suggested.I only asked if you could qualify your pronouncement by undeniable proof.There are many phenomena that are,just that,...the lacking of a verification of cause and effect.The ozone issue is a good example of science and governments working together. And an industry had to re-tool, so!

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

EPA's Leading Climate Change Expert Pleads Guilty to Elaborate Fraud

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

The EPA's Agenda: Undermine Capitalism and America

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

Anyway, have a good lunch or whatever. :)

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

You'll probably ignore it for no good reason but here: w w w.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/sea-surface-temp.h tm l

if you do dismiss it, please have the guts to offer up evidence that supports your conclusion at least.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

"Sorry Kendall just isn't so."

Sorry Tired, it is. Took care of that argument.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

"yet the temps have levelled off"

This leveling off...is the average higher than it was 25 years ago? Yes or no?

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sorry Kendall just isn't so.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

"and are actually cooling in many areas."

A typical failure on your part. The planet hasn't cooled on the avergae so you have to resort to saying (without evidence) that other places have cooled.

Try again when you have some evidence that the planet (you do understand what "global" in global warming means right?) has cooled on the average.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

" the warming would be continuing just as co2 has continued"

It has, you don't pay attention to the oceanic temps do you?

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

" carbon in any form cannot be scientifically linked to global warming"

Actually it has, you just won't accept it. Please review the dozens of previous pages if you want the evidence. Though you won't or you'll lie about doing it.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

If it were, the warming would be continuing just as co2 has continued, yet the temps have levelled off and are actually cooling in many areas.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's the little fact you always miss, your beliefs don't align with proof.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

The poor analogy misses the fact a gun can be scientifically linked to a killing, carbon in any form cannot be scientifically linked to global warming

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

Let's clear out Tired's silly argument about giving up everything that involves fossil fuels is a logical step to take.

His argument is thus; If one says that carbon is the cause for global warming, they should therefor quit using anything that involves carbon.

That would be like saying, If one believes that guns are the cause for shootings, then they should get rid of all their guns.

Pure foolishness because Tired ignores common sense. No one on here has ever implied that we should (as a species) give up the use of fossil fuels and such, only that we should use them better. Just like it would be dumb to get rid of all guns to prevent shootings, you teach people to use weapons responsibly.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

"Be part of the solution, lead by example."

I am...I'm trying to weed out ignorance by asking you questions.

Posted 9 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or