Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
22 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

And I am also right 67% did NOT support AGW

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

harryanderson

Mischaracterized your words?

DIDNT SAY THAT why lie

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

And owiseone was right. 97% of those who opined agreed with the consensus position.

And less than 3% of those who opined rejected the consensus position.

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

Maybe you didn't understand how I turned 0.7% into 1 in every 143.

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

Mischaracterized your words? I used your exact words, which were "0.7 % rejected AGW."

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

You can try to mischaracterize my position all you want, but the FACT IS 97% of 32% in not and never will be consensus, PERIOD

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

Out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That’s less than one percent, not 97 percent. Moreover, as we reported, the Cook study was flawed from the beginning, using selection parameters designed to weight the outcome in favor of the alarmist position.

You don't really have 32% if the truth were known, that's why you keep repeating the lie, you hope it will stick

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

Gotta go now. Adios. Sleep well.

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

According to your reckoning, 99.3% "doesn't" agree with you.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

Only in a dishonest persons mind does 97% of 32% equal a consensus, but you show who you are, but I always knew.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

So if you wish to continue with your 97% lie, well that's on your conscience not mine. Well let the facts speak for themselves. Even in an agenda driven non scientific survey you only could muster 32% agreement. Ill take the 67% who don't buy your BS thanks

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

I only repeated what you wrote. You wrote that only 0.7% rejected AGW.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

But its clear that even those numbers are erroneous, Cook demonstrates a preconceived result and agenda and has misclassified many papers to suit his needs.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

But its clear that even those numbers are erroneous, Cook demonstrates a preconceived result and agenda and has misclassified many papers to suit his needs.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

32% agree with you Harry, that's 67% that doesnt

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

Cook went on to sketch out an entire promotional campaign utilizing press releases, major media programs, booklets, Kindle/iBooks, blogs, etc. “We beat the consensus drum often and regularly and make SkS the home of the perceived strengthening consensus,” Cook advised.

Posted 143 days ago.

harryanderson

According to your post, onlt 1 in 143 papers agrees with your extremist view. Again, the figures you cited.

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

In Cooks own words I anticipate there will be around 6000 “neutral” papers. So what I was thinking of doing next was a public crowd sourcing project where the public are given the list of neutral papers and links to the full paper — if they find evidence of an endorsement, they submit it to SkS (Skeptical Science)…. Thus over time, we would gradually process the 6000 neutral papers, converting many of them to endorsement papers — and make regular announcements like “hey the consensus just went from 99.75% to 99.8%, here are the latest papers with quotes.”

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

Its important to know the source of ones facts so John Cooks activism is relevant, his methodology is also a source of great concern. I will expose these things like or lump it, matters little to me

Posted 143 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or