Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 minutes ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

No solutions as usual ! Denys theres a question !

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

” Gore said. “In addition to 99 percent of the scientists and all the professional scientific organizations, now Mother Nature is weighing in.”

So now ALGORE is claiming 99% of all scientists what a liar

Posted 166 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And again , deny facts and bury em in bullsh^t and lies !

Posted 166 days ago.

Stillhere

Afterall, even in a "cooked" up phony survey of 12000 carefully selected papers, 67% failed to support the AGW

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Trying desperately to convince us all that EVERYONE agrees, why do they always have to try to fabricate consensus where one does not exist?

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

again, I agree with Harry, "there is still no crisis"

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Perhaps Harry can give up some of his luxuries as he admonishes us all to do, starting with that computer. Do you realize the coal it takes to keep you posting propaganda daily?

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Beware of frauds.

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Harry claims to be a Republican, despite the fact he espouses not a single Republican ideal. Don't be surprised that he doesn't know what a conservative is.

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Its important to realize G Shultz is not a conservative just because he worked in the Reagan administration. Harry will try to use anyone he can to bolster his "everyone agrees" narrative.

Posted 168 days ago.

harryanderson

It's critical for conservatives like George Schultz to offer conservative solutions to global warming. No sense ceding the issue to liberals like we've been doing.

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Beware frauds like our dear friend Harry, the local republican slave to science oh and patriot lolololol

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

I agree with George Will and HARRY ANDERSON when he says "there is no crisis"

Yes Harry you are right about ONE thing, THERE IS NO CRISIS

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

"I'm one of those who are called deniers," Will admitted. "Of course the climate is changing, it's always changing. That's what gave us the medieval warm period. That's what gave us -- subsequent to that for centuries -- the Little Ice Age. Of course it's changing."

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Will also said another thing that makes global warming so hard to rebut is that it is essentially a religion.

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

George Will had a good opinion piece on the subject.

Conservative columnist George Will says global warming is just another way for liberals to get what liberals want: more government power.

"Global warming is socialism by the back door," Will told The Daily Caller. "I mean, the whole point of global warming is it is a rationalization for progressives to do what progressives want to do, which is concentrate more and more power in Washington, more and more Washington power in the executive branch, more and more executive branch power in independent czars and agencies, to micromanage the lives of the American people."

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

are we repeating ourselves now Harry? OK

Posted 168 days ago.

harryanderson

I’m not sure I agree with Schultz’s proposed solutions. I prefer the conservationist and personal responsibility approach. We should conserve resources for those who come behind us and assume responsibility for our actions that reduce others’ standard of living.

That being said, I agree with Schultz that, if we fail to act, we’ll be “mugged by reality.” And when that happens, big, intrusive, government steps in to exploit the crisis. That’s when our freedoms erode.

We should all conserve. Turn down thermostats. Walk, bike, or use shared transportation when possible. If we each act responsibly in his or her own sphere of influence, together we can make a huge impact. If we all sacrifice just a few of our present luxuries, we’ll leave better gift to those who follow us. It’s the right thing to do.

Posted 168 days ago.

harryanderson

Here's what I posted this morning, that apparently was too important to leave on the first page, so it was buried in numerous posts.

In an op-ed this morning, another conservative, George Schultz, who was Reagan’s Sec. of State, has proposed action on global warming.

After listing some of the strong scientific evidence, Schultz writes, “These are simple and clear observations, so I conclude that the globe is warming and that carbon dioxide has something to do with that fact. Those who say otherwise will wind up being mugged by reality.”

He proposes research into energy development and a carbon tax, and suggests Reagan, his old boss, might have done something similar.

htt p://ww w.washingtonpost.co m/opinions/a-reagan-model-on-climate-change/2015/03/13/4f4182e2-c6a8-11e4-b2a1-bed1aaea2816_story.html

Posted 168 days ago.

Stillhere

Fact is the natural warming has ended in 1998 and now we are in a slight cooling cycle all natural. But if you really feel the need to give Obama more money I say write the check or STUFU

Posted 168 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or