Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

h t t p://w w w.politifact.c om/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jun/28/richard-durbin/dick-durbin-says-global-warming-leading-evaporatio/

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

@Thats- I found this and thought it was interesting: ***********politifact****/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jun/28/richard-durbin/dick-durbin-says-global-warming-leading-evaporatio/

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

I said, "Will you expand the horizons of your knowledge with a simple enough test or will you hide with your head in the sand? I know you find it quite comfortable there, you seem to spend so much time in that place."

Tired replied, "Why would you say I spend so much time in a place I have never been"

I didn't say you spent so much time at BWW. I said you spend a lot of time with your head in the sand.

Posted 65 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

Then tell me Myth...why did your "scientists" take and alter the date 100's and 100's of time recording the "water" temperature of the great lakes over 400 degrees and use it i their findings to convince imbeCILES like you that the world is getting hotter due to AWG.

Yes your right if a scientist saw that they would say that its wrong..impossible.......but your quack scintestetetets embraced it, used it over and over . But then again are they..................really scientists? Or imbeciles self proclaiming they are "Climate" scientists LOL

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

Will you expand the horizons of your knowledge with a simple enough test or will you hide with your head in the sand? I know you find it quite comfortable there, you seem to spend so much time in that place. I HAVE NEVER BEEN THERE YET YOU CLAIM I HAVE? DELUSIONAL YES

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

I would run too if I were you;

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

Already said BWW is in Vienna WV so yes I know where it is. Why would you say I spend so much time in a place I have never been>?

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

Be back a little later.

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

"you want me to meet you at Buffalo Wild wings tonight at 10 30 so you can prove who you are."

You are the one who is doubting who I say I am. If you believe I am the person I say I am and that I actually wrote the LTE I claimed to write...then all is good.

If you think I am lying, I am merely offering you the chance to be proven wrong.

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

A threat? HAHAHA. Don't flatter yourself.

I offer you a chance to find out something in a safe environment and under safe conditions and you turn yellow.

The only threat was to show you something you didn't know before. And perhaps humble you a little with a fun game of trivia.

Don't try and hide behind your fear. Of course, it is more likely that you don't live anywhere near here and really don't know where Buffalo Wild Wings is.

Or perhaps your mom and dad won't let you out after night...who knows.

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

SO KENDALL, you want me to meet you at Buffalo Wild wings tonight at 10 30 so you can prove who you are.

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

You are saying I spend lots of time at that place? You want me to meet you there so you can prove who you are?

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

You may feel the topic is science but what you really mean is that the topic is science that you accept and nothing else. It's ok, you get confused quite easily.

You do realize that science changes right? To hold a person in 2014 to the standards and ideas of 1970 would be very silly. That would be like forcing a Christian to be a literalist just because a 100 years ago, the vast majority of them were.

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall, I have never been to that place in Vienna, but I take that as some kind of threat. Be careful what you ask for.

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

I do use my real name...Kendall. I've always said that. Seems some angry children don't understand the simple things in life. So tragic.

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

Will you stop by Buffalo Wild Wings tonight around 10:30? I'll even buy you a drink before beating you at trivia.

I am offering you a chance to prove who I am to you. Will you expand the horizons of your knowledge with a simple enough test or will you hide with your head in the sand? I know you find it quite comfortable there, you seem to spend so much time in that place.

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

No TWIT you claimed you used your real name, and now you say you never claimed it, DONT BE A LIAR

Posted 65 days ago.

Tiredofit

NO THE TOPIC IS SCIENCE. SO nice try Kendall78

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

I never claimed once that Kendall78 was in fact my real name. Don't be an ignorant twit.

Posted 65 days ago.

Kendall78

Not the 1970's and today's scientists and research has nothing to do with that stuff.

Posted 65 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or