Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 minutes ago.
by harryanderson
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Oh that's right , that would be an inconvenience !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Yes Myth , who would know more about lying than tiredbrain ! What a tool !

Posted 356 days ago.

Kendall78

"Warming has ceased in the last 15- 17 years."

Be more specific if you can. Do you mean warming has ceased in the atmosphere? In the Oceans?

Is the last 17 years warmer than the 17 years that came before it?

You still haven't defined what you will consider proof in these arguments. Don't you know what you will consider proof?

Posted 356 days ago.

Kendall78

"Show me how to prove a negative"

No one has asked you to prove a negative.

Is this your fallback plan? Keep claiming it's proving the negative so you won't have to do anything?

Posted 356 days ago.

Kendall78

"And this schmuck says he's interested in honest debate?"

He constantly lies.

Lol, it does seem like he has confusion over what proof and truth is.

Posted 356 days ago.

mythravere

Not one more iota of proof will be given to you unless you backup your own claims.

But that's a tactic you use to hide from any kind of criticism.

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Come on ,Prove to me that this study is biased ! Just one fact , that's all I ask for !!! I didn't think so !

Posted 356 days ago.

mythravere

The fact is if you are right Tiredofit and I am wrong. Then the facts support you not me.

Ergo you have the upperhand in this debate.

I can not fathom why you will not provide those facts that make you right.

Furthermore complaining that proof isn't provided to you while refusing to provide your own proof to back up your own assertions is highly hypocritical.

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Prove to me that this study is biased ! Just one fact , that's all I ask for !!! I didn't think so !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I've already shown you non-biased research, so there is the proof you've been crying about ! Now you tell us all whose research are you citing or is it more of your imaginary crap again !

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Prove to me that this study is biased ! Just one fact , that's all I ask for !!! I didn't think so !

Posted 356 days ago.

mythravere

270 pages worth of arguing. The vast majority of which was of me and the others putting info on the table that proves our assertion.

The information you seek as been offered up in spades. You just choose to deny it or ignore it.

So you asking for information and then making out like we have none because we aren't giving it to you is tremendously disingenuous.

But that's par for the course when dealing with you.

Its just one of the many tactics you use to try and shutdown/control this debate.

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

What" REAL FACTS" , you haven't presented anything that is close to real ! I've presented a study that wasn't funded by our government that states climate change is happening and man has a role in it ! Now why don't you present your "FACTS" that you are so very proud of ! Oh wait , YOU DONT HAVE ANY !!!

Posted 356 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Still you just keep on telling yourself that !!!LOLOL! I've already shown you non-biased research, so there is the proof you've been crying about ! Now you tell us all whose research are you citing or is it more of your imaginary crap again !

Posted 356 days ago.

mythravere

But then yet agains we have another problem.

In the past he has stated that even though there is warming man isn't responsible for it.

But now he is stating that there is no warming.

We know the planet is warming. There just is not denying that.

But these inconsistencies are interesting. And so is his refusal to back up his assertions.

Either he is being contrary. Or he has no facts with which to back up his assertions.

Posted 356 days ago.

mythravere

His assertion being positive. Meaning they have facts to back them up.

Our assertion being negative. Meaning not the truth therefore lacking in the ability to be proven as true.

Edited for clarity

Posted 356 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or