Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
96 days ago.
by slinky
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

absolem

he said. Other funders included Nasa, the US Department of Energy, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The use of the weather as a weapon was banned in 1978 under the Environmental Modification Convention (Enmod). the above is a partial representation of the article. this goes along with the concern expressed by some about the HAARP program. it would be interesting to see how the program is reconciled against the aforementioned law banning use of weather as a weapon. Kunectdots...you may not be as out there as some claim. the strange stops being strange when it is proven real.

Posted 358 days ago.

absolem

from The Guardian: "A senior US scientist has expressed concern that the intelligence services are funding climate change research to learn if new technologies could be used as potential weapons. Alan Robock, a climate scientist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, has called on secretive government agencies to be open about their interest in radical work that explores how to alter the world’s climate. Last week, the National Academy of Sciences published a two-volume report on different approaches to tackling climate change. One focused on means to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, the other on ways to change clouds or the Earth’s surface to make them reflect more sunlight out to space.The $600,000 report was part-funded by the US intelligence services, but Robock said the CIA and other agencies had not fully explained their interest in the work. “The CIA was a major funder of the National Academies report so that makes me really worried who is going to be in control,”

Posted 358 days ago.

Kunectdots

Stillhere - I HEAR YA, BROTHER! Imagine, on a day like this, if we had no energy entrepreneurs, exploring for fuel sources on private properties. With a scab on society, like our present glorious leader trying to limit the fossil fuel powered industries of the U.S., we'd all be waiting for his vaunted solar panels to generate some electricity to warm us. Looks kinda cloudy out there, BARACK!

Better have plenty of blankets laid-up for any future Executive Order barrages. Obummer, unfortunately, will be with us through another one and a half winters.

Posted 358 days ago.

Kunectdots

HarryAnderson - I think these people may have a little bit more going on than you or Al Gore can imagine, although I bet Al is a little more 'connected' than you are.

HAARP; "The Military's Pandora's Box"

h ttp://haarp.n et/

Posted 359 days ago.

Kunectdots

COME ON HARRYANDERSON! Where's your rebuttal?

Excellent exposure on the subject of Weather Modification available on the following site.

If man is now on the cusp of controlling the weather, doesn't the "Chicken Little" fear of Climate Change/ Global Warming seem, at least, naïve?

More attention to the HAARP Project and less given to Obama's and Gore's opinions would seem to be in order.

"Weather Warfare" is a 5 part series available for viewing at;

h ttps://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=0aDNajyqM10&list=PLE13D989BF504681B&index=2

Posted 362 days ago.

Kunectdots

Stillhere - I assume other readers here ARE competent enough to note that you quoted the Associated Press (AP) and ohweirdone turned it into Fox News as being your source, AGAIN.

WHY DOES he put such a concerted effort forward to publically demonstrate he's a moron?

Posted 362 days ago.

Kunectdots

But STILL, this nonsense will be a continuing politically-driven force, steered by Obama and Obamanites toward greater governmental control of the people. You know, just like ObamaCare.

Posted 362 days ago.

Kunectdots

294 previous comments posted here concerning "man-made climate change", when in fact the majority of the dramatic changes may INDEED BE intentional "man-made climate" manipulation shows your wrong when you post "nobody cares".

Posted 363 days ago.

Kunectdots

HAARP got your tongues?

Posted 364 days ago.

Kunectdots

Excellent exposure on the subject of Weather Modification available on the following site.

If man is now on the cusp of controlling the weather, doesn't the "Chicken Little" fear of Climate Change/ Global Warming seem, at least, naïve?

More attention to the HAARP Project and less given to Obama's and Gore's opinions would seem to be in order.

"Weather Warfare" is a 5 part series available for viewing at;

h ttps://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=0aDNajyqM10&list=PLE13D989BF504681B&index=2

Posted 368 days ago.

Kunectdots

Here's one that probably eludes being connected to "global warming / climate change", although the threat is very real. As 'talented' as Al Gore thinks he is, I don't see him proposing any insurance against this future, certain eventuality.

h ttp://neo.jpl.nasa.g ov/index.html

Posted 376 days ago.

Kunectdots

"Just cant stand to be wrong can you ?"

WHILE YOU SIT THERE WRITING THAT BASKING IN THE WARMTH OF BURNING FOSSIL FUELS!

What a hypocrite!

Posted 378 days ago.

moderation

"........."

Posted 379 days ago.

moderation

. All of these yield consistent estimates of the approximate magnitude of global warming, which now stands at about twice the magnitude that we reported in 1981. Further affirmation of the reality of the warming is its spatial distribution, which has largest values at locations remote from any local human influence, with a global pattern consistent with that expected for response to global climate forcings (larger in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere, larger at high latitudes than low latitudes, larger over land than over ocean).

Posted 379 days ago.

moderation

The " margin of error is just that.You interpret it to support only your position,tired.

Posted 379 days ago.

absolem

*that

Posted 380 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i understand your point regarding staying on topic but i could not resist in pointing out taht one action by some does not equal the same action..or reaction by others. such is politics and i think you will agree that politics has certainly tainted the honest science that should define the physical world around us.

Posted 380 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i am familiar with Harry and his postings. he is correct in his points. his observation that the politicians job is to get elected spotlights the complexity of representing all interests. speaking a truth does not always lend itself to be an assertion of superiority. i do not read his statement in that fashion.

Posted 381 days ago.

harryanderson

Go to the ocean heat charts I posted, and click on "show error bars."

Posted 381 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm encouraged that the oceans are storing the excess heat energy. It gives us time to figure out how to use it. It shouldn't be too difficult to draw heat from the ocean.

Like Rex Tillerson, head of Exxon-Mobile, has said, "(Global warming) is an engineering problem with an engineering solution.” He called it “manageable.”

Posted 381 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or