Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
20 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Oh do show how there has been warming"

Certainly Stillwrong, just tell me what form of evidence you will accept as evidence.

No point in wasting your time or mine with sources you will not accept right?

Go on, please tell us what form of evidence you will accept. You had many many months to figure it out.

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

you do know the great climatologist Steven Westfall right>???

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Even Steven Westfall says so

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Global Temperature Update – No global warming for 17 years 11 months

Anthony Watts / September 4, 2014

… or 19 years, according to a key statistical paper.

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley |

The Great Pause has now persisted for 17 years 11 months. Indeed, to three decimal places on a per-decade basis, there has been no global warming for 18 full years. Professor Ross McKitrick, however, has upped the ante with a new statistical paper to say there has been no global warming for 19 years.

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Oh do show how there has been warming Jimmy

Posted 276 days ago.

Kendall78

It's humorous that Stillwrong says that there has been no warming in 18 years.

He lies so easily doesn't he?

Posted 276 days ago.

Kendall78

Stillhere=stillwrong :)

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Crippling the coal industry while providing taxpayer money to cronies. yep that's fair

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

SAN FRANCISCO — At an exclusive re-election fundraiser tonight, President Obama hobnobbed with 60 of his wealthiest supporters, including two figures at the center of the Solyndra loan controversy.

Steve Westly, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, was one of the first to raise red flags about the administration’s support for a $500 million loan to Solyndra, the solar energy start-up that later went bankrupt. He wrote directly to senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett in 2010 to raise concerns about the company’s viability ahead of the president’s high-profile visit that year.

Yeah picking winners

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

mythravere We can't provide any proof. You win. :)

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Someone should have told MYTH that threatening to call someone a child molester wasn't cool

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Thought I was gone didn't ya LOL

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

There is STILL not a SINGLE PROBVABLE FACT that links MAN MADE CO2 with WARMING lol sorry but those are the facts

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Anti-capitalist march in NYC mentions climate change; weather remains unchanged

HUMAN EVENTS

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

No warming in 18 yrs now

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

Still not a SINGLE PROVEN fact showing man is causing GLOBAL WARMING.

Posted 276 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Just why do oil/gas/coal need to be subsidized anyway ?

Posted 276 days ago.

harryanderson

Everybody should pay his or her own way. Government should avoid picking winners and losers.

But government picks fossil fuel companies to be the winners.

According to the International Monetary Fund, “On a ?pre-tax? basis, subsidies for petroleum products, electricity, natural gas, and coal reached $480 billion in 2011 (0.7 percent of global GDP or 2 percent of total government revenues). “

ht tp://w ww.imf.or g/external/np/pp/eng/2013/012813.pdf

480 billion bucks. You can cut government spending by 2% just by eliminating subsidies on fossil fuel.

Posted 276 days ago.

Stillhere

;)

Posted 276 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Well Istink some here have to keep seeing your right-wing brainwashed faux news ignorance ! So maybe they should send you to the nether regions with tired !

Posted 277 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or