Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
155 days ago.
by slinky
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

(be back later...hope you have answered the questions by then...see ya)

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

I am waiting on your proof but you keep hiding from the questions. Are they too complex for you to answer?

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

"you fail to produce a single scientific fact that proves man causes global warming"

No I haven't.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired:

Do you think Global Warming is caused in part by the dominant species on the planet Earth? Yes or No

If you answer no, then what is causing the overall rise in temperature?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

I have supported my position. Name calling doesn't disprove that Tired. Try again.

Actually....try this, tell us your position on global warming and why you feel that way. Don't dodge, deflect or beg for mercy.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

My apologizes to Monica Kopacz. But that doesn't excuse the fact that you cite opinion pieces and hope no one notices it.

You also hope no one notices that all those opinion articles you cite never actually prove man made global warming is false.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

"That's really sad for your argument."

In what way? I think you are just frustrated that I was correct and shamed you.

If I am wrong, please show me where you did not cite an opinion piece but something scientific.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

"up with ONE SINGLE provable fact that shows man causes global warming. PERIOD"

I reference this thread. Go and look.

Why don't you offer up any evidence to support what you believe in.

What do you believe in again?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

"Citing others opinions or biased websites does not substitute for proof"

But that's what you do all the time. You did it tonight with that one IPCC lady.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

See...no proof from Tired. He cowers behind ignorance.

He has dozens and dozens of pages of citations and evidence and he ignores it all.

He offers nothing to support his claims and tries to paint the opposition as being wrong when he has shown nothing.

Tired, please realize that if people do not give you information that meets your standards, that doesn't prove them wrong. It requires you to provide evidence that shows they are wrong. You have failed to do that time and again.

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

This is your last chance to answer the dozens of questions aimed at you.

Come on Tired, I have given dozens of citations and evidence that support my claims.

When are you ever going to stand up and put some facts to your claims?

Posted 732 days ago.

Kendall78

"one example just one"

You have over 100 pages to go back and look at showing citations.

Keep in mind that you are trapping yourself here. You are basically saying that "no proof= you're wrong".

You have ever so rarely gave any proper citations. Does that mean you are wrong in your assertions then since you give no proof?

Posted 732 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or