Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
29 minutes ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

It is my hope that OUR party defunds NOAA and cuts the Epa to bare bones, while we are at it NASSA and the IRS should be cut as well

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

Did you celebrate OUR party victory in NOV Harry? lol

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

SO if we are NOT getting HONEST RESEARCH for our dollars, why put more into it?

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

That's exactly what she is saying, we exaggerate to prompt political action and gain funding, do you deny that

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

Dishonesty is not a justification

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

We should not use exaggeration and opinion to garner funding NO

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

Thought you were staying away Harry, guess you cannot

Posted 264 days ago.

harryanderson

So do you think we should reduce the scientific uncertainty and develop more reliable models?

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

ONE, she admits its OPINION and not FACT

TWO she admits to POOR MODELS

THREE she admits to exaggeration

FOUR she admits its done for FUNDING

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

What can we learn from this??

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

MONIKA KOPACZ NOAA Climate project

STILL MY FAVORITE QUOTE

Posted 264 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Yes you seem to have a way to shut the tiredbrain troll up !

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

Nothing's changed Harry not the forum or the climate.

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

try staying away a little longer Harry, maybe that will help

Posted 264 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah , does truth bother the troll ? Useful idiot indeed !

Posted 264 days ago.

Stillhere

Agh the righteous Harry crawls back in to admonish us once again about his superiority. Munsters trolling is no more irritating than you hypocritical dishonest climate nonsense and given a choice I prefer Munsters trolling, at least it's honest, pathetic but it's who he is and easily ignored

Posted 264 days ago.

Kunectdots

Amen, Walt!

Posted 265 days ago.

harryanderson

"Troll." "Dead end useful idiot."

No matter how long one stays away, when one returns, one will find Ohwiseone and Stillhere foiling rational discourse with their childish insults.

Posted 265 days ago.

Ohwiseone

If it would lie about that , what wont it lie about ?

Posted 265 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah , does truth bother the troll ? Useful idiot indeed !

Posted 265 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or