Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

We shouldn’t expect Tiredofit to consider the work of climate scientists. He has already informed us that he doesn’t consider climate science a part of the discussion. He wrote, “it’s a political agenda, not a scientific discussion.”

However, Tiredofit is right when he points to a “political agenda.” Some leftists would use the work of climate scientists to shape the world. And he’s right—we should be wary of these people. Nevertheless, I feel these leftists don’t seriously threaten us because I don’t think they have power relative to we who resist their political agenda.

I must correct what I wrote before, “It’s not a political problem. It’s an engineering problem with an engineering solution.” After further reflection, I realize I was wrong. It’s both a political agenda and a scientific discussion.

Posted 106 days ago.

Tiredofit

I would think such a climatologist as yourself would KNOW that but alas

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh that would be the leaked emails from the East Anglican bunch

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

"THATS WHY WE HIDE THE DECLINE"

Who is "we"?

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I do not believe that the funding in question has made any measurable amount of climate change scientists skew their information or evidence. OF COURSE NOT< THATS WHY WE HIDE THE DECLINE>

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

As far as websites or new articles on the topic, credible information again should include scientists specializing in Climatology.

Polling and petitions should always be scrutinized in these arguments.

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I do not believe that the funding in question has made any measurable amount of climate change scientists skew their information or evidence.

I am open to any credible scientific source for information. Such sources on the topic we are discussing should include the research and findings of actual climatologists and not those that have doctorates in other fields. I mean, who cares what a Doctor in British Literature thinks about climate change..right?

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

Or are a pseudo government agency

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall, what sources do you look at that don't derive funding from the IPCC or UN or Some other enviromarxist organization.

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

That article you cited didn't say anything about if global warming is or is not happening. Just that the ice melt of that peticular area was not due to anthropogenic global warming but climate variability.

Posted 107 days ago.

And by the way, the rescue ship is now stuck, too. The people were safely put on another boat, thank goodness.

Posted 107 days ago.

h ttp://w ww.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/03/antarctic_ice_shelf_melt_lowest_ever_recorded_just_not_much_affected_by_global_warming/

"Antarctic ice shelf melt 'lowest EVER recorded, global warming is NOT eroding it'."

Myth keeps thinking he needs to educate us about the Polar Regions. He and a few others here are the ones who need to read up.

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

I have no faith in the IPCC. I merely observe the information from them and other sources and arrive to my own conclusion on the matter.

You might consider that the problem isn't that there are people that look at the evidence and conclude that climate change and global warming is happening.

But that the opposition has failed to explain why global warming and climate change are not influenced by man.

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

Most of humanity isn't covered in snow. The world is bigger than select sections of the US.

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no amount of evidence that will shake you from your faith in the IPCC and funding scam

Posted 107 days ago.

Tiredofit

Some people cannot see GLobal Warming cause they are buried to their arses in snow, ice and record colds. GEEZ you guys are funny.

Posted 107 days ago.

Kendall78

Some people cannot see the forest for the trees. Then there are those that can't see the forest because they got their face up against a single tree.

Posted 107 days ago.

harryanderson

Weather events aren’t climate.

According to NASA, “In most places, weather can change from minute-to-minute, hour-to-hour, day-to-day, and season-to-season. Climate, however, is the average of weather over time and space.”

ww w.nasa.gov/mission_pages/noaa-n/climate/climate_weather.html

And, according to Politifact, “Data from NASA shows 13 of the hottest years on record have come in the last 15, and by a different data set produced by NOAA, 14 of the hottest years on record have come in the last 15.”

ww w.politifact.co m/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/feb/15/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-12-hottest-years-record-have-com/

That’s time and, since NOAA and NASA study worldwide trends, space, which makes it a CLIMATE trend. What happens in Parkersburg at a particular time is WEATHER.

Posted 108 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth every feel funny calling anyone ignorant>??

Posted 108 days ago.

Tiredofit

I bet if the record high was in 1994 and record low in 1950 would like it a lot better. Just Google parkersburg average temps and you can find it, or are you waiting for the IPCC to issue it ;)

Posted 108 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or