Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
24 days ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Profit is the goal of any company, the fact that our socialist govt has decided they wouls bankrupt some companies should tell you something unless you are a dyed in the wool believer like harry

Posted 53 days ago.

harryanderson

Speaking of sorting through the noise:

Like Fox News reported, major European oil companies, in acknowledging the threat from carbon emissions, are calling for a tax on them. This phenomenon isn’t confined to European oil companies.

Texas-based Exxon, the western world’s largest oil company, more than six years ago called for a carbon tax, according to the Wall St. Journal in January, 2009:

“The chief executive of Exxon Mobil Corp. for the first time called on Congress to enact a tax on greenhouse-gas emissions in order to fight global warming.”

htt p://ww w.wsj.co m/articles/SB123146091530566335

Even oil companies, who will suffer if we reduce carbon emissions, won’t listen to the counter climate change propaganda movement’s noise.

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Youll have to sort through the "noise" but i am sure you can

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ole whiny pus$ !

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

But you are a liar tiredbrain troll and everyone here knows it !

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Trolls like the tiredbrain troll still don't like inconvenient facts ! Heres what you've been asking for but don't want to address !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia Notice they say "will lead to widespread climate change ", not maybe , not some, but will !

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

When you appropriately address that perhaps i will entertain your points

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Then admitted that you knew you said it further compounding your dishonesty? Shall I remind you?

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Do you deny that you called me a liar when i accurately cited your own words?

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

Convenient? Years of putting up with believers in a hiatus isn't convenient.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

If you want to talk about me so much, how about you start a forum on that to satisfy your obsession.

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Isnt that convienent as heck, they find out that the data they relied on was wrong when it quit giving them what they wanted

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

Read the article and then you'll know. I can't keep spoonfeeding you this all day.

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

And how is that ties to co2? Oh yeah you are on both sides of that one and call people liars when thay point out your own words

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

So the article says that and that is proof of what again?

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Hmmmmm well then what about terestrial measurements?

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

According to the report (if you read it you would know this) the previous measurements from buoys were giving an erroneous idea of a hiatus. Revised measurements show that warming has never stopped.

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

Ita quite clear and demonstrable that your claims change over time although you "deny" it until provided evidence

Posted 53 days ago.

Stillhere

So kendall are you now claiming the previous data was eronious?

Posted 53 days ago.

Ohwiseone

" a little ethically challenged "LOLOL!!! Wow ! And that coming from ole whiny pus$ , the king of lacking any sort of ethics or morality ! What a collossal waste of air !

Posted 53 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or