Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
14 minutes ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Inconvenient fact Harry, the EARTH ISNT WARMING, but other than that, you have a good point LOL

Posted 193 days ago.

harryanderson

Even the American Petroleum Institute (API), hardly a bunch of big-government socialists, lists global warming as one of the biggest threats to “America’s future prosperity.”

See the API’s 2015 “State of American Energy” report at

htt p://ww w.api.or g/~/media/files/policy/soae-2015/api-2015-soae-report.pdf

The relevant sentence is at the top of page 17.

Posted 193 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And more bury em in bullsh^t crappola from the republidud tiredbrain troll ! How typical , the ole name em and blame em idiocy of the righties !Like I said , I'm sure that the troll wont turn down that social security check even if it is a socialist program !

Posted 193 days ago.

Kunectdots

"...and the US Military"? That would be the same boys presently playing around with our weather, from Alaska and Puerto Rico, with designs on controlling the world's weather by 2025?

"Please write your Republican representatives in Congress and let them know they’re out of step with their constituents on global warming." REALLY???

That would be the same Congress represented as "A congressionally initiated effort, HAARP is being managed cooperatively by the Air Force and Navy."

SEEMS LIKE A WASTED EFFORT THERE, HARRY! Tell you what. You PROVE that they're not mucking around with the weather and I might take unintended Global Warming a little more seriously.

h ttp://w ww.pakalertpress.c om/2010/08/29/what-is-haarp-videos-photos-and-three-short-articles/

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

The sample consists of 5,513 registered voters, 2,330 of whom (37% of the weighted sample of registered voters) identify as Republicans or as Republican-leaning Independents. -

IF the YALE (bastion of liberal thinking) survey consists of self identified Republicans like Harry, I doubt the results are accurate.

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

Let us recall that HARRY claims to be a local republican of course neither are true, one needs to look no further than his own words for proof of that!

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

When confronted with actual facts, they get snarky and booger off to find the latest talking point of the left

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

When confronted with actual facts, they get snarky and booger off to find the latest talking point of the left

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

These people are socialists make no mistake, the goal is wealth redistribution world wide. They hide behind a coven of very few supposed scientists that derive thier living from propoganda all the while pretending to represent the body of science. They have been dead wrong yet they remain undeterred and frauds like Harry come to forums like these to help the cause.

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

Care to discuss the margin of error yet HARRY?? I thought not!

Posted 193 days ago.

Stillhere

I see the fraud is back with his "Everyone agrees lie". Funny he ran like a schoolgirl when called on his "scientific" claims about 2014 being the warmesr on record! Just a common fraud little else.

Posted 193 days ago.

harryanderson

I’m not in favor of EPA, or any other government body, regulating CO2. I’d prefer that individuals take responsibility for their own actions, including CO2 emissions, and not wait for government to act. I don’t want to give more power to the state.

Happily, 54% of conservative Republicans are ready to accept the science of global warming and address it. And these lead some traditionally conservative organizations, including Exxon, Shell, BP, the British Conservative Party, and the US Military.

Sadly, Congress refuses to accept and act. By so doing, they cede power to the executive.

Please write your Republican representatives in Congress and let them know they’re out of step with their constituents on global warming.

Posted 193 days ago.

harryanderson

It seems every Republican in Congress wants to stop the EPA from regulating CO2 emissions.

However, the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication reports that Republicans in general don’t support the global warming policies of the Congressional leaders.

56% of Republicans “support regulating CO2 as a pollutant.” This includes 54% of conservative Republicans.

44% of Republicans “support setting STRICT CO2 emission limits on EXISTING coal-fired power plants.” (emphasis added)

htt p://environment.yale.ed u/climate-communication/article/not-all-republicans-think-alike-about-global-warming/

Since Republicans in general are about evenly split on regulating CO2, one would think the leaders in Congress would engage in lively debate on this issue. Not so. Congressional Republicans’ policy doesn’t reflect the thinking of their constituents.

Posted 193 days ago.

Kunectdots

Stillhere - I still question how all the C8 got into the local aquifer over the years. IF it is from a process of being purposefully pumped into the ground via "test well" operations, the offender NEEDS TO HAVE their deep pockets explored and somebody should possibly be looking out from behind bars (IMO). THAT would be motive to put your past behind you and "slowly withdrawing from the area".

You are aware, when an offense is egregiously irresponsible and involves massive amounts of ($)damages($), a competent attorney (law firm) can be in position to partially shield the offending party by portraying themselves as representing the plaintiff and moderating the total damage's appearance to the public... for a ($)price($), off course?

Posted 195 days ago.

absolem

moderation...the post immediately preceeding my comment that you question.

Posted 195 days ago.

Stillhere

Kunec, they sue the one with deep pockets, looks as if DuPont is slowly withdrawing from the area

Posted 195 days ago.

Kunectdots

NOW, the operators of the brine injection wells at Torch, Ohio are seeking permission to establish a 4th well. If I were an attorney representing DuPont in ongoing litigation concerning the ill-effects of C8 on humans, I'd be ALL IN FAVOR of as many brine wells established downriver as possible. Future disease development will be hard to blame upon DuPont's negligence if other poisons are being pumped into the aquifers by brine disposal units.

Posted 196 days ago.

Stillhere

I applaud this move. The risk associated with anthropogenic climate change should be a scientific, not a political, issue

What HARRY means is, as long as mathematics or margins of error are not considered

Posted 196 days ago.

Stillhere

He's reduced to saying "see the Brits Agree with me". Lol

Posted 196 days ago.

Stillhere

He's reduced to saying "see the Brits Agree with me". Lol

Posted 196 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or