Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

If not we will allow amateur hour and let the moron post uncorrected

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

We will sort through the NOISE if you care to discuss

Posted 165 days ago.

Ohwiseone

More inconvenient truth !

Posted 165 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Climate change

Climate Consensus - the 97%

The top ten global warming 'skeptic' arguments answered~~~~~~~~ 2015 The Guardian

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Exageration=more funding

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Perhaps we "deniers" have a point?

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Hmmmmm sounds familiar?

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Hmmmmm sounds familiar?

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Lets take a look at what Monika Kopacz the head of the NOAA climate project has to say

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

You see mod that is the problem with the warmer crowd, they just beleive the headline

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Ok the sound bite was dramatic but did you dig further?

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Is that not 68% likelihood that it's BS? Help me with the math lol

Posted 165 days ago.

moderation

This was not part of the report released. "Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all."

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Well mod did you read the fine print? 38% confidence and the margin of error is many times the supposed increase does that not give you pause?

Posted 165 days ago.

moderation

tired- those reports say it was the hottest year.

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Oh HARRY? Don't wanna talk about your claim on 2014???

Posted 165 days ago.

Stillhere

Mod normally its the one that MAKES the claim who has the burden of supporting said claim, otherwise you are viewed in the same light as Munster who is a known moron and we wouldn't want that.

Posted 166 days ago.

Ohwiseone

More inconvenient truth !

Posted 166 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Serial liars and deniers mod ! Does'nt matter what research you show , it wont be good enough !

Posted 166 days ago.

Stillhere

Wouldnt the question be " do you have any verified information to support your claim that 2014 was the hottest year ever?

Posted 166 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or