Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Serial liars and deniers Harry ! Does'nt matter what research you show , it wont be good enough !

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

LOL you cannot show the earth is currently warming so how are you going to show the CO2 is causing it?

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

.1C to .05C is what they ADMIT to, the real margin is likely much higher.

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

SO even NASSA admits that the increase they claim is less than the margin of ERROR

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Q. How accurate are the GISS results (tables, graphs)? A. The GISS results are really estimates based on the available data. Accurate error estimates are hard to obtain. However, it is likely that the largest contribution to the margin of error is given by the temporal and spatial data gaps. That particular margin was estimated as follows: All computations were first made replacing the observed data by complete model data. Then the calculations were repeated after discarding model data where the corresponding observations were missing. Comparisons of the two results were used to obtain an estimate for that margin of error. Assuming that the other inaccuracies might about double that estimate yielded the error bars for global annual means drawn in this graph, i.e., for recent years the error bar for global annual means is about ±0.05°C, for years around 1900 it is about ±0.1°C. NASSA WEBSITE

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Nasa and Noaa scientists report 2014 was 0.07F (0.04C) higher than previous records and the 38th consecutive year of above-average temperatures

HMMMMM .04C well now

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Not your best effort Harry, you gave in to your snarky nature and really couldn't back up your claim. The snark comes when you are in a corner.

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

OK HARRY if its a statistical tie then DO TELL how they ranked them?

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Schooling me? lololo no lad, you were schooled about margins of errors and you refuse to answer the question as it blows your claim right out of the water.

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

A statistical tie is not an absolute tie.

Now I'm done schooling you for now.

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

100 is greater than 99.99, but not by much. It's a statistical tie. Very simple.

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

Easy. It happens all the time. No controversy about that.

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Funny you avoid the questions.

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

please read for comprehension, HOW CAN THREE THINGS THAT ARE STATISTICAL TIE BE RANKED BY TEMPERATURE?

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

Check it, and then tell us what the very first sentence in the abstract says.

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

Did you check my source, stillhere?

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Once again you may avoid the question, WHAT IS THE MARGIN OF ERROR?

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

YOU HARRY posted the claim that 2014 was the warmest ever and yet when pressed you call it quibbling?

Posted 190 days ago.

Stillhere

Much like your cherry picked 97% you don't like the details do you?

Posted 190 days ago.

harryanderson

It shows your desperation that you quibble over which year was warmest by a very small amount. Here's the real relevant statistic from the paper:

"The fifteen warmest years all occurred since 1998."

Posted 190 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or