Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 days ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

moderation

. All of these yield consistent estimates of the approximate magnitude of global warming, which now stands at about twice the magnitude that we reported in 1981. Further affirmation of the reality of the warming is its spatial distribution, which has largest values at locations remote from any local human influence, with a global pattern consistent with that expected for response to global climate forcings (larger in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere, larger at high latitudes than low latitudes, larger over land than over ocean).

Posted 158 days ago.

moderation

The " margin of error is just that.You interpret it to support only your position,tired.

Posted 158 days ago.

Stillhere

Take the recent announcement about 2014 being the warmest on record for instance. Leftists like Harry post it as fact, but somehow ignore the admitted margin of error for that study. If you take ADMITTED margin of error its hard to believe we have had warming at all and if we HAVE had any, there is no proof man is responsible.

Posted 159 days ago.

Stillhere

The truth? NO one will know as the moneyed interests are propaganda machines.

Posted 159 days ago.

Stillhere

Are there those in the fossil fuel industry that wish to influence science? I think without question, however what the "true believers" wont admit is that the hard left and their media sycophants have an agenda as well.

Posted 159 days ago.

Stillhere

Indeed the science has been corrupted by money and politics, I have no reservation in stating so.

Posted 159 days ago.

absolem

*that

Posted 159 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i understand your point regarding staying on topic but i could not resist in pointing out taht one action by some does not equal the same action..or reaction by others. such is politics and i think you will agree that politics has certainly tainted the honest science that should define the physical world around us.

Posted 159 days ago.

Stillhere

That IS THE TOPIC

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

His obsession on global warming is

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

His postings about Romney are not the subject of my interest

Posted 160 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i am familiar with Harry and his postings. he is correct in his points. his observation that the politicians job is to get elected spotlights the complexity of representing all interests. speaking a truth does not always lend itself to be an assertion of superiority. i do not read his statement in that fashion.

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

Checked milk carton at breakfast, NOPE NO HARRY, where can he be>?????

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

I guess Harry isn't about science and fact after all, I AM SHOCKED!

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

Previous post should read .1 and .2C

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

OUCH!

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

(PhysOrg****) -- Half of the globe has warmed at least one half of one degree Fahrenheit (0.3 C) in the past 30 years, while half of that -- a full quarter of the globe -- warmed at least one full degree Fahrenheit (0.6 C), according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center (ESSC) at The University of Alabama in Huntsville.

So if the admitted margin of error is greater than the supposed warming isn't that a problem for your warming ilk?

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

So if the margin of error from NASSA Goddard institute is a full 1 C for recent years and 2 C for years "around" 1900 how can we have any confidence in a .04C rise in 2014??????

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

Lol your getting a little desperate harry

Posted 160 days ago.

Stillhere

There is some Schooling for you Harry

Posted 160 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or