Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Oh boy lets have some fun Harry,

Facts are facts Harry and you are lying about them, 67% of those papers studied by a known CLimate activist do NOT ENDORSE AGW

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

you said so yourself. you have taken yourself to the woodshed.

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

I wrote that wrong. Only one 1 in 143 reject the consensus position.

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

As you said, 0.7% of those studied, or 1 out of every 143, did not reject global warming. Period.

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

I will gladly take you to the proverbial woodshed AGAIN on this one HARRY, come back and play

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

John cooks emails show he started this "study" with the specific goal of creating a consensus. That's not how real science works. The president ( aka liar of the year POLITIfact). Took it even further and added the word dangerous which wasn't even part of the questions

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

sorry for the INCONVENIENT TRUTH HARRY

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

67% of those papers studied did not endorse AGW. Period

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

What childish insults? gullible people??? That was you!

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

And you refuse to admit that my statement is equally true?

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

And you refuse to admit that my statement is equally true?

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

As usual, when stifled in debate, you resort to the childish insults. In doing so, you show who you are.

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

Let me make this as clear as possible. When evaluating opinions, we don't count the opinions of those who don't express an opinion. Got it? 97% of the papers that expressed an opinion endorsed AGW. That's what owiseone said. He told the truth.

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

Mind dear reader this is only data from one supposed study by radical climate activist not to be confused with the positions of science in general, clearly you can see how dishonest HARRY and his ilk are being with THIER claims

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

This is where you are deliberately dishonest, talk about a propaganda campaign designed to film flam, pot meet kettle

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

The vast majority ( call it consensus) did NOT SUPPORT YOUR THEORY OF AGW PERIOD!!!!!

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

The consensus is a nil hypothesis! 97% of 32 % does not equate to a majority

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

What is not factual about that statement HARRY?

LololLOLOL. Cannot bring yourself to admit the truth can you?

Posted 177 days ago.

Stillhere

Read again for understanding this time HARRY Stillhere Let's just say that 67% of peer reviewed experts either denied or did not endorse the theory of man made global warming, correct?

Posted 55 minutes ago.

Posted 177 days ago.

harryanderson

Your post shows the vast difference between the climate scientists who study the issue and the gullible people who have been flim-flammed by the propaganda campaign referenced at the beginning of this thread.

Posted 177 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or