Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
95 days ago.
by slinky
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

The US is lagging behind because of powerful politicians who refuse to consider the science of climate change.

It's bad when even China passes you up in implementing market-based solutions.

"The world's biggest-emitting nation, (China), accounting for nearly 30 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, plans to use the market to slow its rapid growth in climate-changing emissions."

ht tp://ww w.reuters.c om/article/2014/08/31/china-carbontrading-idUSL3N0R107420140831

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

A lot of these groups want to solve this problem with a leftist agenda. I just don't see any sense in belittling the clear and convincing scientific evidence, which lets them dictate their solution. That's nuts.

Posted 503 days ago.

mythravere

And lets not mince words here.

Your feelings about leftists is of the seething hatred kind.

And that is exactly why I say we should stop discussing the issue of climate change itself and focus on why people are discussing it on here to begin with.

Posted 503 days ago.

mythravere

"The two are inseparable as it IS a political agenda, not a scientific discussion." Tiredofit

I get what you are saying. The thing is that YOU think there is a political agenda and thats how you approach this issue.

And that approach completely blinds you.

You seeing it as a political issue...left versus right is exactly why we see you stating everything we lay on the table as false.

Its why you will deny anything we say even if its factually accurate and truthful.

You see this issue as leftist issue and given your feelings about leftists you are totally biased against this issue.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm going to the gym and while you try to figure out a way to accuse me of "twisting" your words when I provided an exact quote, with context .

Hey, I know what you can do. YOU CAN CLAIM I HACKED YOUR ACCOUNT.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

And then tell me about memory.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

Okay.

Go back to page 295 and see for yourself.

Frankly, I doubt you know what you say half the time.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

And I gave you the context. Kendall made a charge and you answered. And I quoted you completely,

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

You'd be advised not to call me liar or question my memory.

I'm trying to let you save face.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

You said it, and I can prove it. You really want to go there.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

"All of you against me, sounds fair"

So you're one of the few who won't accept scientific evidence, and you complain you're not being treated fairly.

Boohoo.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

Scientific proof has been offered, Tiredofit, but you won't listen to it.

It's futile to point you to scientific proof. Kendall wrote of you, “You have done nothing but deny without and try to make this a political argument instead of a scientific one.”

You answered, “The two are inseparable as it IS a political agenada, not a scientific discussion.” (sic)

You admitted that you can’t tell the difference between politics and observable fact, so it’s pointless to present scientific evidence.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

Same old Tiredofit.

Seems like he can’t post without letting us know how how much hate he has in him. When he’s not saying he “would like to see if burning progressives could make electricity,” he’s calling those who believe climate scientists “morons.”

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

Here's some good news. The smart money moves on to solutions.

"Even while the (climate change) subject remains controversial among political figures, with many Republican officials in the U.S. disputing the existence of man-made climate change, growing numbers of investors and corporations are trying to curtail fossil-fuel consumption and prepare for global warming’s damage."

h ttp://w ww.latimes.c om/nation/la-na-climate-investors-20140921-story.ht ml

Posted 503 days ago.

moderation

Oh, you silver tongued devil,you.

Posted 503 days ago.

mythravere

Thats all moot anyways in terms of energy production.

If you want to produce energy from conservatives all one has to do is set up a sizable amount of wind turbines then fill the fields up in front of said turbines with conservatives.

Now the trick to making this work is that you need a huge screen that has the image of Obama making various speeches etc projected on it.

The wind that will hit those turbines would probably out produce a nuclear reactor. Maybe even several of them.

LOL!

Posted 503 days ago.

mythravere

"Well the benifits to our society are not comparable. I would like to see if burning progressives could make electricity" Tiredofit

Oh conservatives by a large have more BTU's.

The success of conservatives means they have far more access to food which they eat excessively which plumps them up.

Progressives on the other hand don't work and so tend to eat less. So their BTU level is lower.

Posted 503 days ago.

moderation

Burning creosote ties illustrates smug ignorance.

Posted 503 days ago.

moderation

Na,tired.Burning old creosote ties is more in line for you.I'll withhold the cut rate mental health eval.,though.

Posted 503 days ago.

harryanderson

"I would like to see if burning progressives could make electricity.

Glad you're still thinking about solutions, Tiredofit. How much CO2/therm btu would burning progressives emit.

Maybe that's a way of solving your "political agenada" (sic).

What kind of oven would you use? And you might research some old Nazi experiments. They may have tried it.

Posted 503 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or