There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
Whether its Clinton Nixon or Obama there should be a price to pay for outright lying to the public
"there are tons of folks out there."
Thre are tons of those folks but they do not represent the public. Just because there are some talking heads on tv supporting Clinton, though I know there was no one that said what he did was morally right, that isn't representive of the general population.
Was Clinton wrong in cheating on his wife? I feel yes. Was he lawfully guilty? No.
Should he have told the truth to Congress right off the bat? Yes. Should it ever came before Congress? No.
When the electorate tolerates bad behavior, they become complicate.
No its his fault he lied, its the electorate that does not call for his impeachment that condones it.
"Government reflects the electorate and visa versa. You cannot separate the two."
So it's not Obama's fault he lied...it's the electorate's fault?
Again, try to keep up. I have said , the Government reflects the electorate, and the two are inseparable.
"You don't think there is corruption in the Government?"
What one thinks and what one can prove is not the same thing. Just ask the jury in the Zimmerman trial.
Reread what I have posted instead of asking silly questions. they were saying it did not matter that he lied perjured himself and commited infidelity. I wont do your research just google it there are tons of folks out there.
"I say lots of folks because I saw them on TV"
Now we got three groups; the general public, the lots of folks on tv and the people in govt.
Which one are you focused on when talking about moral decay?
Government reflects the electorate and visa versa. You cannot separate the two.
"There were LOTS of folks on tv defending Clinton"
What are these "lots of folks" defending? Are they saying he was in the right to cheat on his wife? I would love to see that video clip.
You don't think there is corruption in the Government??????????????????? really
You say people mean x when they say y, that is just speculation, I say lots of folks because I saw them on TV giving that exact opinion, big difference
"So you are making the case that it IS indeed the everyday persons fault?"
If their is corrpution within the govt, which you haven't proven yet, and they let it go on...then yes...it is the public's fault.
However, let's clear up soemthing. When you are complaining about moral decay, are you talking about moral decay within govt or the general population? They are not the same thing.
There were LOTS of folks on tv defending Clinton, do you deny that? I am on trying to interperut their opinion they gave it on every sunday show.
So is it the Everyday persons fault or the Elite class Kendall, make up your mind
"AGAIN I ASK< HAVE YOU BECOME THE SPOKESMAN FOR PEOPLE?" As much as you have for, "Lots of folks".
THEN SAYWe choose the ruling class. Rome did not do that at all. If their is corruption in our govt, it is the fault of the people.S
"YEA SO NOT LIKE THE US THESE DAYS"
How do they take it? They don't take anything that the voting public doesn't give them.
KENDALL SAYS When people complain of moral decay, they are referring to the everyday person. That is not what happened to Rome. Moral decay for them was more or less within the ruling class.
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891