There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
Had I been Clinton, I would have refused to answer the question. I'd have dared them hold me in contempt of court. I imagine many people would back me up. When I got done with Starr, he would be the one humiliated, not me.
But when he lied, he gave up his right to keep his sex life private. What a dummy.
Kendall is right about one thing--Ken Starr should have never made Obama's sex life a public matter.
I believe a person has the right to keep his or her sex life private. Starr didn't accord Clinton that right. I'm against extracurricular borking, but I don't want to borkers publicly humiliated.
How can you think Obama didn't lie? When he first said it, any thinking person should have known he lied. I sure did. If you accept President Obama's statement, you'd have to believe that insurance companies would eat all the extra costs like older kids on plans, preexisting conditions, etc.
Only a fool would have believed that, and only a liar would have said it.
BTW: Politifact just made President Obama's statement "lie of the year."
Wow you really have to shinny way out on that limb to defend this man
definitely a union thinker
So Kendall, you would have to have a video of Obama saying "I am going to lie about this" to move you to admit that he lied. Its HIS SIGNATURE legislation and one would think he would know the details yet he repeatedly misrepresents it
@R1KRA8- sorry, that still does prove anything.
Is there anything that proves that he intentionally lied? Did anyone catch him on camera sayingg he knew what he said was false? Is there any recordings of him saying such a thing? Any manuscripts that shows he knew he was lying?
If not...then there is no proof he was intentionally lying.
Its not his EX life as you put it that I am interested in, its his perjurers statements
You seem much more interested in Clinton's s e x life than I, what is the official word?
I have to get busy would like to keep this going will check the forum later
So the official record says LWEINSKY STUFF????
You didn't answer, who suspended his license and on what basis was it suspended
"Who suspended it and why"
He only had a license on Arkansas..so there. Why? For the Lewinsky stuff.
And now he can practice law again, so how bad was it all in their eyes if they would allow him back?
Curious, should the whole Lewinsky mess have gone as far as it did? If yes, then should they have done the same to Bush and the WMD situation?
"If you are going to try and say that Obama did not lie, I think you must be delusional"
What you think doesn't matter anymore than what those who thought Zimmerman was guilty. It matters what you can prove.
"Bill Clinton's law licenses was stripped for what reason?"
Stripped so badly that he can practice law anytime he wants to now.
"I am guessing Pipefitter. Just a wild guess."
You are full of wild guesses today.
"If you like your plan you can keep it PERIOD, is that a true statement?"
It would seem not to be. Can you prove that he intentionally lied? Yes or No.
Who suspended it and why
mmmm ok why was it suspended
"Why was his law license revoked???"
It's more accurate to say suspended. He can reestablish his license anytime he wants in the state of Arkansas.
If you are going to try and say that Obama did not lie, I think you must be delusional
Bill Clinton's law licenses was stripped for what reason?
I am guessing Pipefitter. Just a wild guess.
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891