Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
14 days ago.
by mythravere
Kendall78
#1

LtTE Overreactions

There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

@Tired- and in what way does those question have to do with the topic Harry is talking about?

The topic is about the science and global warming/climate change.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok Harry, how old is the earth. Were Adam and Eve the first two people in the garden of eden?

Posted 234 days ago.

harryanderson

“Anthropology Geology Climatology Harry denies two out of three.”

That statement is not true.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

Anthropology Geology Climatology Harry denies two out of three.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry how relevant is science as it applies to the origins of man, the age of the planet etc? Tell us again how Eve and Adam were the first people and a snake made em eat an apple???????? Come on Harry tell us how you believe in SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

I have never heard of anyone HIDING THE DECLINE in an Engineering Class.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

You are getting a little bitter there Harry, sorry for besting you so often, I will try to let you win once in a while.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oneil your Bible thumper is Harry the fraud, not I. You are the one who discounts any study or opinion unless the person is a Climatologist, Bill Nye is not. Don't look now but a volcano erupted in El Salvador, yikes

Posted 234 days ago.

harryanderson

"@Tired - If you had even the slightest understanding of CO2 induced climate-change, you should be aware by now that it is the warming of ocean currents (particularly in the Pacific) that affects weather patterns."

He can't do that, O'neill. To him, it's a "political agenda, not a scientific discussion." He admits that he doesn't consider scientific fact relevant to the discussion.

Posted 234 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sure there is warming or we would have glaciers across northern Ohio, and thank God for it.

Posted 241 days ago.

mythravere

"Unthinking, oneill, you are surely one of the most active liars."

You'd know! After all who said there isn't any warming at all when it comes to the climate of this planet.

Takes a liar to know a liar and all that!

Posted 241 days ago.

Unthinking, oneill, you are surely one of the most active liars. What a nut. I would be for slavery and that other stuff? Lol I bet I have more minority friends than you do.

And now, thousands of hurting democrats know it was, and is, right to repeal it. Better listen to Manchin, folks.

Posted 242 days ago.

Kendall78

Of course though, to really know if Obamacare is a success or not, we have to give it a few years.

History will be the judge and if the average American is more healthy 20 years from now due to Obamacare, then it will be deemed a success.

Posted 242 days ago.

Well, it is hot air oneill Sunday again. Wonder who cares what he thinks about Fox News and republicans.

He also mentions people "futilely" trying to sabotage obamacare. I believe the records show that obama is doing a fine job of that himself. What a people hurting mess he has made.

are.

Posted 242 days ago.

Kendall78

65 years old was too young. My condolences to the family.

Posted 245 days ago.

Tiredofit

I concur, I will pray for Mr Smiths family.

Posted 245 days ago.

moderation

My sincerest condolences to the family of Editor James Smith.

Posted 245 days ago.

I,too, am very sorry about Editor Smith. My sincere sympathy goes to his family.

Posted 245 days ago.

harryanderson

Ithink belittles myth for “beating on that old wmd drum.”

Then, to drive the point home, she writes, “Bush had only been in office a few short months…The clinton security people and system were still in place.”

Let’s see how many “short months” Bush had been in office and still relied on the “Clinton security people and system.” Bush assumed the Presidency on Jan. 20, 2001 and invaded Iraq, ostensibly because Hussein still had WMDs, on March 20, 2003.

That’s exactly 26 months.

Now, Ithink may have meant 9/11. If so, her comment isn’t relevant, since we’ve been discussing WMD’s. WMD’s weren’t a factor in 9/11.

Like Kendall, I’d like to know, “Was this goof up on the WMD still the fault of Clinton and the Dems?“

Posted 248 days ago.

Kendall78

I've been quite critical of Obama. As much as I was with Bush.

When Sec. of State Colin Powell gave his speech before the UN on the topic of WMD...what year was it?

Was it mere months after Bush took office? No.

Was it one year? No.

He gave his speech on 05Feb03. That is over two years since Bush came to office. Was this goof up on the WMD still the fault of Clinton and the Dems?

Posted 248 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or