There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
? ? ? “Google is in obama's back pocket.” ? ? ?
* * *
Shooting for a Moon Filled With Robots
Over the last half-year, Google has quietly acquired eight technology companies in an effort to create a new generation of robots.
The New York Times
Impeachment is basically a trial...a trial that requires facts. Please explain where the provable facts are and how they show that he did something illegal.
I'm just giving you a hint of reality which you seem to lack.
But go ahead, explain how they can impeach the President with the evidence they currently have?
Then you can add why any of those noble souls in our Govt haven't done started the process yet.
Just giving you a hint about impeaching a president, Kendall. It is obvious you know nothing about the process. Who were your civics professors? They did a lousy job.
Wow, Ithink didn't add a single bit of new information or a fresh pov to the conversation. How weird ;)
Politifact awards ‘Lie of the Year’ to Obama
By Aaron Blake
The House easily has the votes to impeach obama any time they want to. Of course the Senate would not convict him.
Clinton was impeached for lying under oathe, but his democrat senators ignored the evidence.
If obama read any of his pet healthcare law he knew he was lying. If he did not know, then we have someone inferior to Donald Duck for a president.
Kendall sounds more like he is ready for the bug house every day. Very weird.
@harry- you have to admit there are those that are chomping at the bit to find some way to try and impeach Obama. They think this could be their chance but it's not.
By the time Obama is out, Obamacare will still be the law of the land and Obama will finish his term without impeachement. At least in regards to Obamacare.
The next President won't overturn Obamacare. It is here to stay whether we like it or not because unless soemthing drastic happens, by the next election it will be firmly entrenched in our society.
Good grief, look how long it took the govt to overturn prohibition and it was a disasterous failure of policy.
@harryanderson- "How can you think Obama didn't lie?"
I've never said that I don't think he lied. What I am aiming at is the difference between thinking and proving.
There are those who would try to impeach Obama on the basis of truthiness...what they feel is true from their gut. Personally I think he knew full well that what he said was going to be wrong at some level if not all the way. But proving it to the extent of impeaching the man and even if this was an impeachable offense is what matters here.
"So Kendall, you would have to have a video of Obama saying.."
Not really, I would accept the same type of proof that got Nixon to resign.
Had I been Clinton, I would have refused to answer the question. I'd have dared them hold me in contempt of court. I imagine many people would back me up. When I got done with Starr, he would be the one humiliated, not me.
But when he lied, he gave up his right to keep his sex life private. What a dummy.
Kendall is right about one thing--Ken Starr should have never made Obama's sex life a public matter.
I believe a person has the right to keep his or her sex life private. Starr didn't accord Clinton that right. I'm against extracurricular borking, but I don't want to borkers publicly humiliated.
How can you think Obama didn't lie? When he first said it, any thinking person should have known he lied. I sure did. If you accept President Obama's statement, you'd have to believe that insurance companies would eat all the extra costs like older kids on plans, preexisting conditions, etc.
Only a fool would have believed that, and only a liar would have said it.
BTW: Politifact just made President Obama's statement "lie of the year."
So the only “PROOF” or evidence that Kendall78 will accept is . . . “catching him on camera saying he knew what he said was false” or “recordings of him saying such a thing” or “manuscripts that shows he knew he was lying”?
If he does not ADMIT, we must acquit?
Wow you really have to shinny way out on that limb to defend this man
definitely a union thinker
So Kendall, you would have to have a video of Obama saying "I am going to lie about this" to move you to admit that he lied. Its HIS SIGNATURE legislation and one would think he would know the details yet he repeatedly misrepresents it
@R1KRA8- sorry, that still does prove anything.
Is there anything that proves that he intentionally lied? Did anyone catch him on camera sayingg he knew what he said was false? Is there any recordings of him saying such a thing? Any manuscripts that shows he knew he was lying?
If not...then there is no proof he was intentionally lying.
Can you prove that he intentionally lied?
Flowchart of President Obama’s “You can keep your plan, period” defenses
by Keith Hennessey
Its not his EX life as you put it that I am interested in, its his perjurers statements
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891