Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
76 days ago.
by Kendall78
Kendall78
#1

LtTE Overreactions

There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

Oh yea and there are studies out there that show people who watch Fox News are misinformed and watching Fox News makes them contentious and angry.

Seems the right loves to snort that crap like a cocaine addict.

Posted 357 days ago.

mythravere

So when the numbers show Fox News with more viewership it simply means there are more people tuning in on the TV.

Those numbers do not take into account other methods of news consumption.

Take me for example. Every single bit of news I consume is done their my computer or apps on my cell phone. I do not watch televised news at all.

Posted 357 days ago.

mythravere

" Just saw on Drudge "

Yea no conflict of interest at all in the reporting there! LOL!

If anything people are just getting fed up with bad reporting from ALL of the "news" outlets.

And I highly doubt people are flocking to Fox News either. Fair and balanced my a55! Fox News is a shill for the Republican party lock stock and barrel.

Also you can whine and cry about how slanted to the left CNN and MSNBC is. But is that really the truth? I mean if someone isn't heaping praise upon rightwing causes,issues and people then its slanted left right?

Also and I have said this before. People on the left are a heck of a lot more tech savvy than those on the right. So I am fairly confident people on the left have far more sources for their news than CNN and MSNBC. Where on the right we see a far higher incidence of people using traditional media consumption methods like TV and newspapers.

Posted 357 days ago.

Kendall78

No one is questioning his right to write a letter to the editor. We are merely exercising our right to point out what we see as flaws in his arguments.

Posted 357 days ago.

Mr. Brandt has the same right to write over the line stuff as you lefties constantly do.

And your Fox News criticism is wasted hot air. Just saw on Drudge that CNN and MSNBC have lost half their viewers. Fox News is doing great. People are tired of just hearing one side of the news.

Posted 358 days ago.

Kendall78

Makes one wonder doesn't it Myth?

Posted 358 days ago.

mythravere

Dang I wonder what ever happened to TinFoilHat?

Posted 358 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 359 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 359 days ago.

Kendall78

Like a dog with an old bone you are. I gave you the means to arrive at an answer and you decide to do what exactly? Nothing constructive.

How many more times you going to mention this? As many as your headlines that no one reads...including yourself?

But by all means keep it up, it will be fun to see how long you can keep going.

Posted 359 days ago.

Letters to the Editor this week had so much in common. No sense, no importance, and nothing of value. Actually when I saw the first two, I said "Where is PR" ,and lo and behold, there he was. Three very predictable and disgusting socialist rantings.

Posted 360 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired- well...the letter he was commenting about was a bit out there.

Posted 360 days ago.

Kendall78

Ah..see, I knew someone would send a letter addressing the foolishness of that letter last week: "Lies need to be challenged" by Ralph Chambers

Posted 360 days ago.

Kendall78

I suppose this answers the question if you ever write many letters to the editor. That answer is a resounding no.

Posted 361 days ago.

Kendall78

What's childish about it? It's as fake as your other screen name and makes just as much sense.

Watch that thin skin lad..it seems to break easily.

But since I hurt you, I apologize and will try this again.

Do you understand the letter to the editor policies? You are not suppose to write more than a certain number of letters in a given amount of time.

Posted 362 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't think Kendall's afraid to call out somebody. I say this because he's not afraid to attach his name to his posts.

I call that taking responsibility.

Posted 363 days ago.

Kendall78

Do you understand the letter to the editor policies R1krap? You are not suppose to write more than a certain number of letters in a given amount of time.

Posted 363 days ago.

Kendall78

I don't like MSNBC at all. I am a realist Ithink.

I have no problem with a person saying Obama lied in regards to Obamacare. I think he did at some level. But when you start saying he lied because of Muslim connections or other bs...then that person should be called out.

Posted 364 days ago.

You should apply for a talking head job on MSNBC, Kendall. You could all go around with your heads in the mud.

Posted 364 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired- you are welcome to interpret the verse and the use by Brant as you see fit. I simply see it as silly to apply that specific verse and its implications to Obama.

Posted 364 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or