There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
Since you two climatologist have declined to tell us how you have garnered such a vast knowledge of the science I will have to assume you are little more than useful idiots for the agenda.
I can only imagine that for once you must consider yourself amongst the educated. That somehow, you have an understanding that propels you above us neophytes that have a level of skepticism. Funny
Tired, ad hominems won't demonstrate you know what you are talking about in regards to climatology.
If you do indeed do not believe in man made climate change, what credible information do you have to present. That is how you demonstrate you have a working knowledge of the topic. It's that simple.
I implied it because you have not demonstrated that you do posess such knowledge yet.
If you have a degree in climatology you would like to declare you may but that won't mean much when you do not argue good information to back your argument up with.
Kendall be a man, defend your position or run like a school girl, honestly it does not matter one bit.
Now Kendall you can run like a jackrabbit if you like, but you implied that some how I did not understand science or have the intellect to appreciate climatology in some fashion.
@myth- I think Tired believes he can win an argument with an educational degree d*ck measuring contest.
Sadly, he is mistaken.
from the mathematically challenged we have this. SERIOUSLY
How have I ran away? I said nothing but fact. My educational background does not change that.
I would have thought you wouldn't put much into an educational background. After all, Obama has a doctorate but that doesn't mean he knew squat about Health Insurance.
Tiredofit if you are highly educated then why do you say the things you do.
Or is your knowledge only of things that fall under the purview of your world view with all other points and considerations falling victim to your obvious bias?
In other words if you don't believe it then it mustn't/can't be true.
Anytime my man, anytime
I guess running away from it is the course you have chosen.
"clearly the implication is that I am somehow inferior to you in intellect"
In intellect? Not established yet. But in citing credible sources and establishing a knowledge in basic fundamental climatology...you appear to fall short.
"If I had to guess sir,"
No need to cuss.
"I would guess I have spent far more time in higher education than you."
Guessing seems to be something you do a fine job at. Knowing on the other hand..eh.
"Care to tell me about your academic pedigree?"
Why? Would that make my arugments better or worse than they have already been presented? Would they make your arguments better?
"Do you know a single thing about my background and education?"
Nope, all I have to go by are your various and colorful comments on here to go by.
"How do you know what I understand about science ,mathematics etc."
I can only go by what you have posted on here or the lack thereof.
Would you care to back that assertion up, or simply run away from it?
clearly the implication is that I am somehow inferior to you in intellect as I don't see things the way you do so I think the question is germane
If I had to guess sir, I would guess I have spent far more time in higher education than you. Care to tell me about your academic pedigree ?
Do you know a single thing about my background and education? How do you know what I understand about science mathematics etc.
"I am not of the same quality as you who believes it completely?"
No, just that you are not of the same quality in regards to understanding the scientific method and the logic needed to understand this field of climatology.
I am quite a skeptical person. If one would and/or could provide credible information to the contrary to the theory of anthropogenic climate change, I am more than willing to read it.
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891