There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
“Anthropology Geology Climatology Harry denies two out of three.”
That statement is not true.
Anthropology Geology Climatology Harry denies two out of three.
Harry how relevant is science as it applies to the origins of man, the age of the planet etc? Tell us again how Eve and Adam were the first people and a snake made em eat an apple???????? Come on Harry tell us how you believe in SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION
I have never heard of anyone HIDING THE DECLINE in an Engineering Class.
You are getting a little bitter there Harry, sorry for besting you so often, I will try to let you win once in a while.
Oneil your Bible thumper is Harry the fraud, not I. You are the one who discounts any study or opinion unless the person is a Climatologist, Bill Nye is not. Don't look now but a volcano erupted in El Salvador, yikes
"@Tired - If you had even the slightest understanding of CO2 induced climate-change, you should be aware by now that it is the warming of ocean currents (particularly in the Pacific) that affects weather patterns."
He can't do that, O'neill. To him, it's a "political agenda, not a scientific discussion." He admits that he doesn't consider scientific fact relevant to the discussion.
@Tired - If you had even the slightest understanding of CO2 induced climate-change, you should be aware by now that it is the warming of ocean currents (particularly in the Pacific) that affects weather patterns ... Columnist Thomas Friedman correctly characterized what is happening as "global weirding", resulting in fiercer storms, dryer droughts, erratic weather events (60 degrees one day and 15 degrees the next). Obviously, you Bible-thumpers (who tend to blame everything upon "God's wrath") don't listen to Bill Nye the Science Guy!
... And, oh yeah, you keep calling me a "liar", but you never cite any real facts that refute my views - you only cite opinions that you regurgitate from FOX or Limbaugh!
@IT - BTW, where exactly (except perhaps in the imaginings of FOX pundits and stooges like you) are those "thousands of Democrats" who are opposed to the ACA? The facts suggest that over a million uninsured Americans have signed up for some form of insurance via health-care exchanges in states like Kentucky, Massachusetts, California, New York, etc. ... Briefly, back to the "Duck Dynasty" crap that has so many News & Sentinel LTE writers worked up this weekend - why does it seem (correct me if I'm wrong on this one) that so many so-called "Christians" have to hate something - President Obama, progressives, liberals, gay people, certain minorities, folks of different religions - in order to fulfill the requirements of their so-called "faith"?
Yes IThunk, but I wonder if some of your alleged "minority friends" would still consider you to be a "friend" if they knew what you sometimes say or imply here under your phony moniker? ... The "Duck Dynasty" guy also fantasizes that he's "not a racist", but his GQ statements about how "happy" black people were during the Jim Crow era suggest otherwise!
I am SHOCKED to find that some Bible-thumping phony peckerwood from the Southern swampland turns out to be a homophobic racist! I am, however, NOT shocked to find that the local rightwing crew - having run out of faux "conspiracy" crap about Obamacare - is swarming to Robertson's defense! Yawn!
Sure there is warming or we would have glaciers across northern Ohio, and thank God for it.
"Unthinking, oneill, you are surely one of the most active liars."
You'd know! After all who said there isn't any warming at all when it comes to the climate of this planet.
Takes a liar to know a liar and all that!
Unthinking, oneill, you are surely one of the most active liars. What a nut. I would be for slavery and that other stuff? Lol I bet I have more minority friends than you do.
And now, thousands of hurting democrats know it was, and is, right to repeal it. Better listen to Manchin, folks.
@IThunk - Has it been 44 or 47 times that the overpaid dweebs in the House of Reprehenables have voted to "repeal" Obamacare? How'd that work out fer ya?
Hi IThunk! Thought you would enjoy that one! Keep regurgitating those FOX fibs and there's more where that came from ... Some other nice pieces in Sunday's N&S LTE section ... The Constitution was signed in 1787 and not fully ratified until 1791, so Kendall is correct about the possible verdict of history - it takes time to create progress (especially when it has to wade through a sea of fibs to reach fruition). I'm sure that IThink & her little friends would have probably have favored keeping the Articles of Confederation, slavery, segregated schools, voting rights for wealthy property-owners, hampering minority voting rights, and unlimited air and water pollution in the past, as much as they hate the idea of providing insurance to the uninsured today! Joyous Yule, y'all!
Democratic senator says Obamacare could have 'meltdown,' hurt party
Of course though, to really know if Obamacare is a success or not, we have to give it a few years.
History will be the judge and if the average American is more healthy 20 years from now due to Obamacare, then it will be deemed a success.
Well, it is hot air oneill Sunday again. Wonder who cares what he thinks about Fox News and republicans.
He also mentions people "futilely" trying to sabotage obamacare. I believe the records show that obama is doing a fine job of that himself. What a people hurting mess he has made.
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891