There are many people I respect on here, so it seems very odd to me when they go so off base with critiques on their own writings.
Tiredofit if you are highly educated then why do you say the things you do.
Or is your knowledge only of things that fall under the purview of your world view with all other points and considerations falling victim to your obvious bias?
In other words if you don't believe it then it mustn't/can't be true.
Anytime my man, anytime
I guess running away from it is the course you have chosen.
"clearly the implication is that I am somehow inferior to you in intellect"
In intellect? Not established yet. But in citing credible sources and establishing a knowledge in basic fundamental climatology...you appear to fall short.
"If I had to guess sir,"
No need to cuss.
"I would guess I have spent far more time in higher education than you."
Guessing seems to be something you do a fine job at. Knowing on the other hand..eh.
"Care to tell me about your academic pedigree?"
Why? Would that make my arugments better or worse than they have already been presented? Would they make your arguments better?
"Do you know a single thing about my background and education?"
Nope, all I have to go by are your various and colorful comments on here to go by.
"How do you know what I understand about science ,mathematics etc."
I can only go by what you have posted on here or the lack thereof.
Would you care to back that assertion up, or simply run away from it?
clearly the implication is that I am somehow inferior to you in intellect as I don't see things the way you do so I think the question is germane
If I had to guess sir, I would guess I have spent far more time in higher education than you. Care to tell me about your academic pedigree ?
Do you know a single thing about my background and education? How do you know what I understand about science mathematics etc.
"I am not of the same quality as you who believes it completely?"
No, just that you are not of the same quality in regards to understanding the scientific method and the logic needed to understand this field of climatology.
I am quite a skeptical person. If one would and/or could provide credible information to the contrary to the theory of anthropogenic climate change, I am more than willing to read it.
Are you suggesting that if I find it suspect, somehow I am not of the same quality as you who believes it completely?
That comment says a lot about you.
One must also take into consideration to the quality of person that would consdier it to be very suspect information.
No perhaps not, but advocating for more Govt control on VERY SUSPECT INFORMATION does.
I doubt that supporting global warming with information makes one a progressive socialist.
You have demonstrated what YOU are Oneil and that is a progressive socialist
It was not I that called it global warming it was the very hacks that*****off the public dole, when it turned out that that there was in fact no warming, you socialisit deemed it climate change much like the global cooling of the 70s
You are such a tool
Oneil we all know what you are, take a break from your socialism and understand likey aint proof
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891