Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
526 days ago.
by Kunectdots
Tinfoilhat
#1

Hillary Clinton will Run for President and She will Win

She will win for the exact same reason the last POTUS won, she is a novelty. As shameful as it is, people will vote for her strictly because she is a woman and not necessarily because they think she is the best candidate for the job.

 
 

Member Comments

Newt Gingrich lost the nomination a decade ago with his hypocritical persecution of Bill Climton, Rick Perry's arrogance did him in, Rick Santorum is no more a fiscal conservative than Barrack Obama, and Ron Paul never stood a chance so realistically, who was a better candidate than Mitt Romney?

Posted 531 days ago.

Kunectdots

Dear harryanderson - If I were an officer of the local Democratic Party, I'd probably "still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate" too.

Posted 531 days ago.

Kunectdots

Dear harryanderson - If I were an officer of the local Democratic Party, I'd probably "still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate" too.

Posted 531 days ago.

mythravere

I put it this way Tiredofit. A person can be totally right about something but the way in which they convey the facts they are putting forth makes them totally wrong.

Some on the right take a holier than thou approach in how they deal with other people.

That doesn't help anything.

In my own personal dealings with people it doesn't matter how right they are about something if they come across as an buthole. I tend to ignore them after they breach that barrier.

Posted 532 days ago.

harryanderson

I felt, and still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate.

Posted 532 days ago.

Which conservative are you referring to? I hope it's not Santorium as his fiscal voti g record was anything but conservative.

Posted 532 days ago.

Kunectdots

McCain, a 'marshmallow' Republican at best, lost because of his coattail attachment (in the eyes of the people) to George W. Bush. Mitt Romney LET Obama beat him. One would have to be a adamant believer in conspiracies to support this, but it's almost as if Romney was intentionally put in the running as a 'spoiler' to derail the campaigns of more qualified Conservative candidates in order to return Obama to office.

Surely, Fate WILL step in and preserve us from a Hillary presidency. We've done many things wrong as a nation, but nothing so severe that we should be cursed with her.

Posted 532 days ago.

mythravere

They knew how to "market" Obama to the voters. The Republicans just ran a straight "this is a bad man" campaign and lost twice because of it. They didn't sell themselves to the people and adopting extreme and in some cases what can be construed as hateful positions hurt them.

They need to be more positive and less contrary.

Posted 532 days ago.

Barrack Obama didn't win simply because he was a novelty. He won because he ran a better campaign 3 times, first in the 2008 primary and then in 2 general elections. He got his supporters out while his opponants couldn't and he did a much better job of defining his opposition. You can't blame all of that on a novelty.

Posted 532 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or