Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
447 days ago.
by Kunectdots
Tinfoilhat
#1

Hillary Clinton will Run for President and She will Win

She will win for the exact same reason the last POTUS won, she is a novelty. As shameful as it is, people will vote for her strictly because she is a woman and not necessarily because they think she is the best candidate for the job.

 
 

Member Comments

Kunectdots

(cont) If you were reading these threads during the campaign, I was hoping that Herman Cain would have been the one to go head-to-head with Obama. It would have taken the basis of race out of the picture and Cain's experience with business would put him in charge of a restaurant chain will Barack Obama worked the French fry machine for him (on a comparative basis).

Posted 452 days ago.

Kunectdots

AaronS - So what you're saying, apparently without realizing it, is that none of the possible candidates for the Republican nomination had more business/governmental experience than a community organizing, part-time senator from Illinois when, in fact ALL of them did.

Maybe Romney seemed the most 'personable', but look where that's gotten us today with Mr. Cult of Personality in the WH.

The ObamaCare program, that is nowhere near being launched but has already cost billions and is already being described as a "Train wreck" was the first thing Newt Gingrich said he would repeal. You don't think Newt is going to be proven right for that observation.

Posted 452 days ago.

Newt Gingrich lost the nomination a decade ago with his hypocritical persecution of Bill Climton, Rick Perry's arrogance did him in, Rick Santorum is no more a fiscal conservative than Barrack Obama, and Ron Paul never stood a chance so realistically, who was a better candidate than Mitt Romney?

Posted 452 days ago.

Kunectdots

Dear harryanderson - If I were an officer of the local Democratic Party, I'd probably "still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate" too.

Posted 452 days ago.

Kunectdots

Dear harryanderson - If I were an officer of the local Democratic Party, I'd probably "still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate" too.

Posted 452 days ago.

harryanderson

I felt, and still feel, that the nominating process chose the best candidate.

Posted 453 days ago.

Which conservative are you referring to? I hope it's not Santorium as his fiscal voti g record was anything but conservative.

Posted 453 days ago.

Kunectdots

McCain, a 'marshmallow' Republican at best, lost because of his coattail attachment (in the eyes of the people) to George W. Bush. Mitt Romney LET Obama beat him. One would have to be a adamant believer in conspiracies to support this, but it's almost as if Romney was intentionally put in the running as a 'spoiler' to derail the campaigns of more qualified Conservative candidates in order to return Obama to office.

Surely, Fate WILL step in and preserve us from a Hillary presidency. We've done many things wrong as a nation, but nothing so severe that we should be cursed with her.

Posted 453 days ago.

Barrack Obama didn't win simply because he was a novelty. He won because he ran a better campaign 3 times, first in the 2008 primary and then in 2 general elections. He got his supporters out while his opponants couldn't and he did a much better job of defining his opposition. You can't blame all of that on a novelty.

Posted 453 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or