...when the Democrats try to make not working pay, while the Republicans try to make working not pay.
There was a time when one income fed housed and planned for a day to retire, now 3 incomes in 1 home still does keep a roof overhead and kids out bof food insecurity, and retire,you can do that when your dead, aaaw corporate , conservative, govt. Your grandpa,s potus(ike), warned you about.?......
There's a new kid in town, or at least Herman has a new name. He also just discovered copy and paste.
De nada, tiredofit.
Tiredofit said- "I'll bet every one of these socialist libs in here broke one or more of these rules and now want something from those who didn't " Do you click your heels when you stand up? Have you never heard that perfectionism is fatalistic ?
While I agree that minimum wage standards can hinder employment for a small segment of society and they do add to the cost as discussed below, I have little doubt that were they abolished in this day and age, there would be companies that abuse employees by paying them a low wage. It can be argued that supply and demand would set the wage but I’m not so sure that would happen.
Saying that, In this day and age, if one is willing to work, shows up on time, is dependable is willing to seek out and participate in ongoing educational opportunities, they will make more than minimum wage regardless of the industry they are in.
That last sentence should read, "I don’t like the current system, in which profits rise greatly and non-workers get more and more benefits, but wages of honest workers stay about the same."
I admit to bias here. I'm biased in favor of people who aren't afraid of honest work and would prefer to earn their own way.
I want such people to have a better deal. I don’t like the current system, in which profits rise greatly and non-workers get more and more benefits, wages of honest workers stay about the same.
“Hence fewer jobs, and everyone pays a higher price.”
Do you have any evidence that fewer jobs overall would result? Wouldn’t the increased spending by the workers generate more economic activity and more jobs?
There is currently redistribution from the taxpayer to the consumer.
I'd like to see government benefits cut and wages increased.
Under the current system, where many low-wage employees rely on government benefits, the so-called rich taxpayer subsidizes these jobs. I say the consumers of the goods and services these employees produce should pick up the tab.
And if there is no demand, maybe there should be no supply.
"Harry, raising the minimum wage only increases unemployment and raises prices."
Every time I get a raise, it puts money at my disposal.
My initial post wasn't literally accurate. Sorry. I should rephrase it to, "Democrats try to make not working pay more and Republicans try to make working pay less."
When Republicans work to keep the minimum wage down, they are trying to make work pay less. Meanwhile, Democrats work to raise unemployment benefits. The two policies, in effect, provide financial incentive for not working.
How are Republicans making working not pay Harry?
519 Juliana St. , Parkersburg, WV 26101 | 304-485-1891