Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Have an absolutely outstanding best weekend of you life FLUFFY ;)

Posted 1 hour ago.

Ohwiseone

;) someone is still trying to deflect ! Whats the matter, Are you ashamed by that fact that you knew what that was ?

Posted 2 hours ago.

Stillhere

;). You too fluffy

Posted 4 hours ago.

Ohwiseone

Still the question remains , Just Tell us all how you knew what that term meant ole whiny pus$ ! Well............ we are STILL waiting, perv ! What ? are you ashamed of the fact you knew what that term means ? You should be !

Posted 6 hours ago.

Stillhere

Thanks fluffy, hope your holiday weekend is awesome too

Posted 8 hours ago.

Ohwiseone

Still the question remains , Just Tell us all how you knew what that term meant troll ! Well............ we are STILL waiting, pervert ! What? are you ashamed of the fact you knew what that term means ? You should be !

Posted 12 hours ago.

harryanderson

I asked, "If anybody can cite a single instance where the US government has compelled a climate scientist to alter his findings, I'd like to see it."

Are you saying this Monika Kapacz published a fraudulent study. Got a link to it? Got a link to the quote so I can put it in context?

Posted 22 hours ago.

Stillhere

Done with you for now. I have much better things to do. have a lovely weekend

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Its all about the money Harry, but you know that, you are just a common fraud who comes to a forum where you have no connection to spread you left wing socialist propaganda. Its just that simple

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Check mate

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

Monika Kopacz NOAA climate project lead

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

Monika Kopacz NOAA climate project lead

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Its simple even for you Harry, WHO pays for the research from groups like NOAA, NASSA or the IPCC?

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Much like your evidence that oil companies are buying denier science

Posted 1 day ago.

harryanderson

If you have evidence all these 197 Worldwide scientific organizations have been purchased by government, let me know.

If the anybody can cite a single instance where the US government has compelled a climate scientist to alter his findings, I'd like to see it.

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Funny you blame oil companies for DENIER rhetoric until they agree with YOU. Seems you cannot accept that money buys opinion when it agrees with you. But being a the fraud you are it really doesn't surprise me.

Posted 1 day ago.

Stillhere

Of course Harry everyone whos living is based on Govt grants agrees with Govt, color me shocked. LOL Don't understand why It is not 100%. Glad to see you are back to the "everyone agrees" argument.

Posted 1 day ago.

harryanderson

Not everybody agrees that humans are contributing to global warming, but a very strong majority of climate scientists do.

Here is a list of 197 Worldwide scientific organizations that agree.

htt p://opr.ca.g ov/s_listoforganizations.php

I can think of no scientific organizations that deny humans are contributing to global warming.

Posted 1 day ago.

Ohwiseone

Still the question remains , Just Tell us all how you knew what that term meant troll ! Well............ we are STILL waiting

Posted 1 day ago.

Ohwiseone

;) someone is still trying to deflect ! Whats the matter, Are you ashamed by that fact that you knew what that was ?

Posted 1 day ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or