Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

To have had a "use" for me to begin with speaks volumes about Tireddofit.

That just proves that your only intention on here was to troll people and mess with them.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Good then my plan finally worked.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

And now where were we.

Here are the facts about this debate on here.

We have provided piles of proof to back up what we believe.

When you ask for proof its a loaded question,a logical fallacy. There no real intention of wanting information. Its you in a roundabout way stating that we haven't provided you with any information. Its you casting doubt about us.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

"Try saying that to a mans face one day, let me know how it works out, when your jaw heals that is"

That would never happen since I don't hang around people like you in real life.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

What else is there to do but use the nuclear option with you?

You won't listen to reason. I could politely ask you to stop wrongfully stating that I am a socialist.

But hey I know that won't happen. Look at the fun you made of me when I admitted I had a learning disability in math.

And you say that I am dispicable. Pure hypocrisy.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

The thing is I never called you a child molester did I?

I only insinuated that I might do that if you kept wrongfully accusing me of being a socialist.

But leave it to you to act like I actually did call you one.

And then you calling Ohwiseone a fluffer up on the Marrietta times forum...do you even know what that means?

You actually called someone that. And then you whine about what I said.

Pure hypocrisy on your part.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Here are the facts about this debate on here.

We have provided piles of proof to back up what we believe.

When you ask for proof its a loaded question,a logical fallacy. There no real intention of wanting information. Its you in a roundabout way stating that we haven't provided you with any information. Its you casting doubt about us.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Your comments lead me to believe that you FEEL that you have somehow won this debate.

Sorry pal but you haven't. You actually lost it from the moment you decided to debate in such an underhanded manner.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit not in your wildest dreams have you bested me in anything. LOL!

Posted 32 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 32 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

“You may offer what you define as proof, go ahead show us.”

In view of what you just posted, I’ll repeat the question I asked twice yesterday, and which you avoided answering.

Are you now willing to consider scientific evidence?

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

You guys might as well give up citing science to Tiredofit. He’s been quite clear; he won’t accept scientific evidence. He wrote, “…it IS a political agenada, not a scientific discussion. (sic)”

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

Once again, Tiredofit suppresses rational discussion. He demands “proof,” but won’t accept proof under the most common definition of it.

He defines proof two ways. He wrote, “Proof is a concept that is really only applicable in mathematics, because math deals with abstract concepts and definitions.” Under this definition, changes in land and sea temperature, disappearing ice at the poles, and the like aren’t evidence. These things can be observed. They aren’t abstract, so Tiredofit won’t accept them because they can be observed.

He also wrote, “To be proven, something needs to be demonstrable and repeatable.” According to this definition, rapidly rising temperatures over the last century don’t count because we can’t repeat the last century.

Tiredofit’s position is absurd.

Posted 32 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

True or false Triedofit.

You will deny any and all facts/proof we provide even when they are truthful and accurate.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

"We have no proof, you win ;)"

You forgot the all important smiley.

I was just seeing if you'd do a victory dance.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Lizden is a climatologist"

He's retired now though. So is his information up to date? I don't know.

But something you should know about him.

He acknowledges that the planet is warming. Unlike you.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

True or false Triedofit.

You will deny any and all facts/proof we provide even when they are truthful and accurate.

Posted 32 days ago.

mythravere

Where is your proof Tiredofit?

Posted 32 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or