Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

There has been NO evidence that a change is needed. NONE. If there was, you would have provided it. What there is, is lots of opinion and predictions that have failed to date. You know this or you would shut me up with some HARD evidence.

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"church of ALGORE."

Wow, that's a pretty p*ss poor attempt at guilt by association Tired.

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"But it WAS funded by government."

And the "so what" question comes about.

Do you have any evidence Tired that there is a direct correlation betwen funding and what the results of the scientist's findings?

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"It is up to those advocating a change to justify said change.

And the change has been justified with evidence you have chosen not to accept.

Not really much more can be done with you.

There is also something to be said about those that want to stay the course for not good reason but to stay the course.

It has been acknowledged that man effects the Ozone Layer and that global warming is happening. Why would one keep allowing it to happen if it is harmful to us?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

There are folks reading this meaningless drivel, and its for them I ask the question. I don't expect to convert the true believers of the church of ALGORE.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

But it WAS funded by government. Swing and a miss

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Well , you don't know anything other than your right-wing brainwashing will let you and I have research from a study that's not funded by the USA ! HMMMMMMM now who would a sane person believe ??

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Someone have some proof or is this just an exercise in what you believe vs what you know>

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Still valid questions,Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

,I would like to see the facts you're working from ! If your point of view is valid then by all means show us your facts !

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

It is up to those advocating a change to justify said change.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Just one?

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Please tiredbrain ,I would like to see the facts you're working from ! If your point of view is valid then by all means show us your facts !

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

You are so funny Tired. We have asked you and whomever else is on your side of the argument for any proof of your argument. You give none and then want others to provide you with info. You are so intellectually lazy.

At least Greek makes an attempt and I can respect that.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still waiting for one verifiable provable fact that proves man is causing climate change. Just one.

You claim to have all this proof

You waste page after page making excuses as to why you will not give one example.

Hmm

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

mythravere Squirrels also have no role in changing the climate.

I agree with that comment.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Can you prove that theory MYTH>???>>

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh god you ******* dumbass.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here that since squirrels live in trees and areas with lots of plants and such. I am betting their meager output of co2 is taken up by the plants in their local environment before it can harm the climate. Not that they could anyways.

So I guess I just played your game again.

Posted 8 days ago. »

Posted 7 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Oh that's right , that would be an inconvenience !

Posted 7 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or