Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by harryanderson
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

From where did you copy that post, stillhere?

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

preach on brother there are souls to win and money to be made.

Posted 173 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Inconveniant facts aren't the trolls friend !

Posted 173 days ago.

harryanderson

Stillhere, you posted:

"Out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That’s less than one percent, not 97 percent. Moreover, as we reported, the Cook study was flawed from the beginning, using selection parameters designed to weight the outcome in favor of the alarmist position."

I'd like to check the credibility of your source. From where did you copy this?

Posted 173 days ago.

Ohwiseone

What an absolute lying fool !

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Do you guys were ceremonial robes? I imagine them to be green robes but have a nice red lining inside?

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Much like Catholics that see the Virgin Mary in toast etc, you guys see global warming in snow, rain drougt hot cold well any weather. It's delusional yes but shows an impressive ability to constantly reinvent your doctrine on the fly

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

More bad news for warming alarmist central, this time from a pillar of the Church of Climatology, the Norway based Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (Cicero).

Il

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Do you place carbon offsets in the collection plate or just your liberties?

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Again I am truly impressed with you faith, amen brother and always pass the collection plate

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Worship as you will at the feet of the prophet ALGORE, it matters little to me

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Disbelief in your religion does not constitute one on my part, but nice try

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Ahhh the oil companies that you suddenly trust when they sing from your hymnal? Lolol

Posted 173 days ago.

harryanderson

Do you know who paid for your counter climate change bible? Who filled the collection plate? Who paid for the words you posted?

Do we mere mortals get to read the words your counter climate change gods have written? Or is that only for you true believers?

Posted 173 days ago.

harryanderson

From where did you copy and paste that "Out of 12,000 scientific papers..." quote of a few minutes ago?

Care to let us know where your "bible" is? After all, only 1 of 143 climate change papers subscribed to your religion, according to your own words.

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

I am sure that in observance of your devout faith, neither of you are burning any fossil fuels and perhaps have learned to limit your breathing to some extent. Amen brothers and pass the collection plate, ALGORE needs some fuel for his private jet.

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

I admire your stick to it attitude in the face of failed prophecy and embarrassment. How you smoothly transition from global warming to climate change, and how you can take any weather phenomena and tie it to your cause. Impressive, and demonstrates a faith that would make Job proud

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Right back atcha HARRY

Posted 173 days ago.

Stillhere

Out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That’s less than one percent, not 97 percent. Moreover, as we reported, the Cook study was flawed from the beginning, using selection parameters designed to weight the outcome in favor of the alarmist position.

Hmmmm

Posted 173 days ago.

harryanderson

Of course, according to figures cited by stillhere himself, only 0.7% of peer-reviewed papers "see" things the way he does.

Posted 173 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or