Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
25 days ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

my statement is absolutely factual do you DENY that

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

Let's just say that 67% of peer reviewed experts either denied or did not endorse the theory of man made global warming, correct?

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

The vast majority of the papers reviewed DID NOT ENDORSE THE THEORY OF MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING, my statement is also true right HARRY

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

Lol that's hardly 97% of scientists

Posted 142 days ago.

harryanderson

Owiseone's post is accurate. 97% of those who took a position agreed.

So is yours. You say that only "32.6% endorsed it. And the way you also say, "0.7% rejected AGW."

Seven-tenths of a percent is 1/143. So you've provided further evidence of the consensus by stating that only one paper of 143 agrees with your position by "rejecting AGW."

And therein lies the rub. Scientists who study the issue overwhelmingly disagree with the deniers, even as the deniers have managed to hoodwink many who lack the expertise to make a judgment.

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

Here’s the genesis of the lie. When you take a result of 32.6% of all papers that accept AGW, ignoring the 66% that don’t, and twist that into 97%, excluding any mention of that original value in your media reports, there’s nothing else to call it – a lie of presidential proportions.

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

From the 11 994 papers, 32.6 per cent endorsed AGW, 66.4 per cent stated no position on AGW, 0.7 per cent rejected AGW and in 0.3 per cent of papers, the authors said the cause of global warming was uncertain.

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

The 97% consensus – a lie of epic proportions Posted by Anthony Watts

Posted 142 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Skeptical Science's 2013 'The Consensus Project'......A Skeptical Science peer-reviewed survey of all (over 12,000) peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' and 'global warming' published between 1991 and 2011 (Cook et al. 2013) found that over 97% of the papers taking a position on the subject agreed with the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.

Posted 142 days ago.

Stillhere

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis FORBES

Posted 143 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Cant fight the truth so deflect, deflect,deflect !

Posted 143 days ago.

Stillhere

Is that a hockey stick in your pocket or are you just glad to see me? Loololl

Posted 144 days ago.

Stillhere

Is that a hockey stick in your pocket or are you just glad to see me? Loololl

Posted 144 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The Climate Crisis: An Introductory Guide to Climate Change by David Archer and Stefan Rahmstorf.

Posted 144 days ago.

Ohwiseone

In fact the longer it goes the more research and data can be collected and so far the ostrich bunch with their heads buried in the dirt are finding themselves on the short end of the stick ! Basically because they have no data to support denying everything !

Posted 144 days ago.

Stillhere

So it seems despite those who wish it were not so, the debate is far from over, in fact they are losing

Posted 144 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And nitpicking spelling errors etc, is the sign of a low IQ jackarse ! Like I've said in the past you will screw up and I'll be there to jump your idiotic , lying arse ! Just a matter of time !

Posted 144 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or