Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
16 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Lol little Jimmy, I have as much proof of anything I have posted as you do that co2 is causing the planet to warm. There is a fact for ya Jimmy

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"of course the climate changes, always has, always will."

Hmm, seems someone is trying to form a strawman. No one on here has denied that climate changes.

The only denier on here are those that think the dominant species on the planet has not effect on the climate.

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"Scientists who go along with the cause are rewarded...also with altogether billions in hard, cold cash"

No evidence that they get direction from anyone in the govt to say what they want.

Try dealing in facts for once.

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"but because it is a justification for a government takeover of the energy industry"

You have no evidence of this conspiracy theory.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

What do you say, we will raise taxes until we see glaciers in Marietta again.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Then you try the ole bait and switch, climate change means NOTHING, of course the climate changes, always has, always will.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Exactly

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Similarly, the theory of man-caused, catastrophic, global warming is embraced not because of any “science,” (that sham is for the “useful idiots,”), but because it is a justification for a government takeover of the energy industry, with massive increases in regulation, taxes and government spending.  The United Nations loves it because it inspires fantasies of the UN growing up to be a world government, with real government powers of global taxation, spending and regulation, all “to save the planet.”  Scientists who go along with the cause are rewarded not only with praise for their worthy social conscience, but also with altogether billions in hard, cold cash (government and environmental grants), for their cooperation in helping to play the “useful idiots.”  Moreover, many academic scientists are “progressives” themselves, and so favor sharp increases in government spending, taxes and regulation, because they are certain they know how to run your life better than you do. From FORBE

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

Lured them out? What do you mean by that?

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

And just like that, you have lured them all out.

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

ht tp://dailycaller.co m/2014/05/22/republicans-can-change-the-debate-on-climate-change/?

Many of us Republicans won't go along with the demagogues. We want a seat at the table when solutions are being considered, and we may not get that seat if we practice balkanization.

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

As far as this being an issue that should only be addressed by the "socialist left," many Republicans disagree.

Republican pollster Alex Lundry wrote in the right-leaning Daily Caller:

"Americans believe global climate change is real. This includes 51% of Republicans who say the effects are already happening, or will happen shortly, or will happen in their lifetimes."

The polling I've conducted has convinced me of the necessity for Republicans to address these real concerns about climate change in ways that reflect our principles and priorities and satisfy public demand for practical solutions."

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

So....no facts to back up your claims Tired?

No evidence?

No citation?

Nothing changes much with you does it?

Posted 33 days ago.

Tiredofit

He'll be going to the school yard taunts soon, you'll find he likes to call people liars or cowards, keyboard hero stuff you know the type.

Posted 33 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is one, just wait for shemp.

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

"A new study by a “group of mean reactionary science purists” at the Journal Nature Climate Change took a look at 117 of the Left’s wild claims."

Tired...try to lie better will you. The title is,"Global warming predictions proven wrong 97.4% of the time"

Predictions are not the same as facts. Why do you think that if a prediction is incorrect that the science is wrong too?

If it is predicted that 14.7 million illegals are going to cross the border but only 14.6 million do...is there still a problem with immigration even if the prediction didn't pan out?

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

"Global warming predictions.."

I think you are confused by predictions and facts Tired.

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

"Suddenly the Marxist socialist left saw the opportunity.."

Conspiracy theory. No evidence.

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

"They are pretty invested in this thing and tend to lash out when you question their religion."

Whose "they".

I simply look at the science of the situation. It's those that look toward conspiracies like govt coverups or payoffs that treat this topic like a religion.

As we add to our understanding of this topic, attitudes change. But...if a person thinks global warming is not happening, then they should show evidence instead of..well...nothing.

Posted 33 days ago.

Tiredofit

A new study by a “group of mean reactionary science purists” at the Journal Nature Climate Change took a look at 117 of the Left’s wild claims.  Its results are devastating for Gore and the Left. They show that 114, or 97.4%, of them were wrong. They weren’t just a little “ooops, I hit the wrong number on my computer – wrong but wrong by a you – don’t – know what – in- the – world – you’re –are talking – about” wrong.  The average “mistake” was an overstatement of global warming by double actual reality.

Posted 33 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or