Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 hours ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Those of you who advocate a change in our energy policy are those that must make the case for it."

Oh, I see you dropped "radical" from your statement. That was wise of you since it made absolutely no sense when you said it before.

The case was made and backed up with evidence. That's why the energy policy is changing in a steady and responsible pace.

It's funny that the deniers lie to say that the climate change is natural as it is a good thing, but then seem almost frantic when people want to try and get the atmosphere back to a more natural state.

"a smart arsed punk"

Ah..the childish insult. Wouldn't be a night of Tired's ranting without one.

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

"I have asked for ONE PROVABLE FACT and you fail time ad again."

No, we haven't failed at all.

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

"Just because you cannot make your case, doesn't mean I have to make one for you."

Actually our case was proven many time on here.

You refusal to back up your case with facts shows you really have none to offer.

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

OK Ill check back and see if you come up with anything. Not holding breath.

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

Those of you who advocate a change in our energy policy are those that must make the case for it. LOL I know its a lot harder then just being a smart arsed punk but try will ya

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

I have asked for ONE PROVABLE FACT and you fail time ad again. All you seem to want to do is talk about ME. As flattering as you must think that is, I find it creepy

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

Just because you cannot make your case, doesn't mean I have to make one for you.

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

Guilt by association works both ways

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

Yep...you have laid no proof down at all Tired.

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its the exact same evidence you give for Heartland being told what to say by oil companies. Remember all that proof you laid out...........oh wait there was none

Posted 5 days ago.

mythravere

"Do you have evidence (not opinion) that funding from the govt had some kind of note that told the scientists to say something?"

Of course he doesn't. He has the really good ability of being able to have a thought about something..believe its true..but yet have no evidence to back it up.

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

"but it IS Funded by GOVT"

And a big "SO WHAT?" must be asked.

Do you have evidence (not opinion) that funding from the govt had some kind of note that told the scientists to say something?

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

ahhhhh but it IS Funded by GOVT, swing and a miss MUNSTER try again. lololol

Posted 5 days ago.

Ohwiseone

research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 5 days ago.

Ohwiseone

YIREDBRAIN, TO USE THIS TIME TO MAKE YOUR CASE WITH PROOF.

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

"THEY advocate for a radical change in our energy policy"

No we don't. You lie.

Posted 5 days ago.

Tiredofit

TRY to write a post without my name in it, obsess much?????

ITHINK< watch out you are about to go down the rabbit hole of logic with Mo and Larry.

THEY advocate for a radical change in our energy policy and think WE OWE THEM PROOF OF WHY THEY SHOULDNT. ITS LAUGHABLE

Boys, and I do mean boys, TRY TO USE THIS TIME TO MAKE YOUR CASE WITH PROOF.

Posted 5 days ago.

mythravere

Well thats patently false. We know the climate is getting warmer. We have a good understanding of what that extra heat can do. And we have pretty good idea how the effects of that extra heat can impact man.

What we don't know is how it will affect day to day weather. Or seasonal weather for that matter.

Posted 5 days ago.

Kendall78

So you are claiming ignorance as your defense?

I will also assume that means you are unable to states any facts that Tired has made on the topic? That's not surprising at all.

Posted 5 days ago.

THE climate change fact is that no one on either side knows how the climate will change. But we all know that it will change. Always has, always will. With no blame or thanks to man.

Posted 5 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or