Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Since warming has ceased in the last 18 years, just how much could man be contributing?

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

Peer review? So the others agree that they need more funding? I am stunned

Posted 90 days ago.

harryanderson

I agree. It's not true that 97% of all scientists agree AGW has catastrophic consequences.

But, as I said, 97% of respondents to a survey "who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change. . . think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.”

And those scientists who specialize in climate change and whose articles have stood the test of peer review are the experts, in my opinion. You disagree, and I'm okay with that.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

"Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous."

Barrack Obama

First of all, the 97% is a lie, All scientists is a lie, And the word dangerous wasn't even part of the survey he pretending to cite

Naaaaa nothing politic there

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

The Obama quote is the line the socialist left is pushing, gee sounds political to me.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

hold on to your delusion, it's all that's left of your global warming nonsense.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

And no your statement is NOT accurate, but you already know that.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

Yet I am responsible for what joe bast says? You seem confused by what I poster perhaps it would benefit you to read it again, I didn't lay responsibility for Gore or Obama on you, Stop corrupting my post, as you might say.

Posted 90 days ago.

harryanderson

Again. My statement is accurate.

Posted 90 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm not responsible for what Barack Obama says. His statement earned Politifact's "lie of the year" award, not mine. My statement is accurate.

I'm not responsible for what Al Gore says, either.

I don't like much of what either of those guys say, despite your delusions to the contrary.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

You are doing your part I see.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

there simply is no basis for that number. Its a lie that the left hopes to repeat long enough to be believed.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

"Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous."

Barrack Obama

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

You are talking about 75 people, who in the OPINON of COOK (noted activist) and his team, supported man made global warming.

Posted 90 days ago.

Stillhere

Well of course you were not referring to ALL scientists, just the ones that agree with your position. You seen to ignore the 66% plus that didn't support your position however. Rational Discussion, harldy

Posted 90 days ago.

harryanderson

You seem confused about what I wrote a few hours ago. I said nothing about “a consensus of scientist (sic) who agree that man is causing catastrophic changes in the climate.”

Perhaps it would be helpful to you if I repeated my words. I wrote: In a survey published by the National Academy of Sciences, 97.4% (75 of 77) of respondents “who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change. . . think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures.”

My words should be clear. I wasn’t referring to “scientist(s)” or “all scientists.”

You’re also confused about my citation.

Stop distorting what I write. It prevents rational discussion.

Posted 91 days ago.

Stillhere

You, like Cook, wish to present a consensus of scientist who agree that man is causing catastrophic changes in the climate, but you do it by false pretense.

Posted 91 days ago.

Stillhere

Thanks for agreeing with my post, now explain if 66.4% stated NO POSITION, how 97% could support AGW???

Posted 91 days ago.

Stillhere

Thanks for agreeing with my post, now explain if 66.4% stated NO POSITION, how 97% could support AGW???

Posted 91 days ago.

Stillhere

Of course it is

Posted 91 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or