Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

No one wants to force you to believe man has a hand in global warming.

You are confusing being taken to task on what you say for being forced into believing something.

I could care less what you believe..but if you come on here and make comments on the issue then you open yourself and what you say for scrutiny.

The same for any topic.

Posted 71 days ago.

A religion is a belief that influences the believer's life to a great extent. Fanatical global warmers fit that description. They believe and want to force others to believe. Like radical islam, and myth's false view of Christianity.

Leave the rest of us alone and don't force us to pay for your radical opinions, and we don't give a hoot what crazy views you have about controlling the climate.

Calling that opinion a religion , is as true as " if you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan". Note, both falsehoods are told as truths by the same " scientific experts".

Posted 71 days ago.

harryanderson

Myth, you wrote, “One tiny little bit of hearsay is the deciding factor for tiredofit!”

Tiredofit’s actions certainly support that statement, Myth. He keeps quoting about reducing the scientific uncertainty, and I keep asking him if he’s interested in “reduc(ing) the scientific uncertainty.”

He refuses to answer. It seems he’s afraid to find out for sure because scientific certainty might attack his counter climate change religion. Certainty would prevent hearsay, innuendo, and doubt.

As long as people like Tiredofit whose product is doubt can cite “one tiny little bit of hearsay,” they can cling to their counter climate change faith.

Think about it, Myth, why else would Tiredofit refuse to say whether or not he is interested in reducing the scientific uncertainty? As long as 97% of the world’s top experts agree with the IPCC, he has hope for his religion. When that percentage reaches 100% or certainty, all his hope is gone.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

Anywho...I hope everyone has a good weekend and enjoy the Olympics :)

Go USA!

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

What else could I do get since you simply will not discuss the topic like a rational adult?

You ignore requests for information to support your position.

You ignore evidence when it is provided to you.

You have gotten "personal" more times than most when faced with the harsh realities your wish to ignore.

Honestly, I would love to have a rational conversation on science and even politics but I feel that at the moment I am Diogenes with a lamp.

Posted 72 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well as long as you don't get personal. LOL

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

"Just don't worry if I don't believe it."

I never worry about what fools say since the truth will always be the truth.

"Why try to convince me of something you have no proof of."

You are an untalented liar. Tired, you do not get to decide what is proof and what isn't. That is way above your paygrade. Proof has been offered and you either are too stubborn to accept it or too ignorant to understand it.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

"DO you have any PROOF that they are correct, again I cannot prove a negative as you so correctly stated. All your predictions and models have proven FALSE."

I have NEVER asked you to prove a negative. You say they lie and all I am asking you to do is to prove it.

Besides myself, there have been many people on here that have provide evidence that man has effected the earth's climate. You just won't accept it.

I have no models and have made no predictions. What you want is since the predictions have not panned out, that man made climate change is false which simply is not the case.

Think about it...those predictions were made based on available data. Regardless of the cause, the data was still the same and that is what the predictions were based on.

Posted 72 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit just admit that you do not want to believe man has a hand in changing the climate ergo that is the whole reason you object to the findings of the scientists.

I dont think you honestly care what the facts say. You see it as a gateway to socialism and that bunches your panties and well there's your position.

Posted 72 days ago.

mythravere

One tiny little bit of hearsay is the deciding factor for tiredofit!

Posted 72 days ago.

mythravere

" All your predictions and models have proven FALSE."

How do you know they are false?

Care to share the information?

If you don't then that pretty much means you are a smoke blowing troll.

Posted 72 days ago.

Tiredofit

I get it, you have bought into the religion, far be it from me to talk a person from their faith. Just don't worry if I don't believe it. Why try to convince me of something you have no proof of.

Posted 72 days ago.

Tiredofit

Goes to show the acceptance of lying if the greater good is served. DO you have any PROOF that they are correct, again I cannot prove a negative as you so correctly stated. All your predictions and models have proven FALSE.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

Going back to the quote in question, "So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate"

Do you know what the word "might" means Tired? Here is a hint, it doesn't mean it's a fact.

Again and again and again, do you have any real evidence that the vast majority of climate science that states that mankind is involved with climate change is lies?

Yes or no

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

I suggest you learn the art of using quotation marks. It would help you a great deal.

Posted 72 days ago.

Tiredofit

GET A CLUE KENDALL

Posted 72 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall are you really that dumb? The quote is NOT Dysons its MS Kopecz the director of NOAA climate project talking about Dyson and later admitting that Climatologist lie ie exaggerate to gain reaction and funding, geez

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

But if you really like Dyson and will believe him then here is a quote, "One of the main causes of warming is the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from our burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal and natural gas."

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

National Climatic Data Center director Tom Karl, "It's critically important to compile a big picture....The signs that we see are of a warming world."

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

Freeman Dyson is a theoretical physicist and mathematician. What he is not is a climate scientists involved with NOAA.

He might know if findings are lies being told in the fields he works with but there is no evidence from him that is happening in regards to the research in climate change.

Try to avoid the scientists that are not climatologists.

Posted 72 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or