Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
8 hours ago.
by harryanderson
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

So Tiredofit, since you wrote that we'll "most likely" use less fossil fuel in the future, how do you suggest we prepare?

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

How about ONE PROVABLE FACT PROVING MAN IS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

How about ONE PROVABLE FACT PROVING MAN IS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Besides isn't it your side saying how awful it is to be persecuted when they do something stupid like possibly dressing as a nazi if that was the exact case.

But the right does like to put out hit pieces and take things way out of context.

Posted 6 days ago.

harryanderson

"Saying we need to get away from fossil fuels because they are running out would be a more believable and tangible excuse because the effects of it becoming more scarce is already being felt."

We should also move away from fossil fuels for national security purposes. It will happen. Even 2/3 of Republican-leaning voters think we should.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

"But it was COOK THE NAZI WANNABE THAT CAME UP WITH THE LIE OF 97%"

It was my understanding that those "nazi" pictures were photoshops.

Do you know the circumstances surrounding them?

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Come on how about some proof?Tiredofit You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

But it was COOK THE NAZI WANNABE THAT CAME UP WITH THE LIE OF 97%

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Come on cowards, where is your PROOF, are you out of excuses yet?

Are you out of the words from other people yet?

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Come on how about some proof

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Skeptical Science is the same as wattsupwiththat.

They are both to taken with a grain of salt.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Come on cowards, where is your PROOF, are you out of excuses yet?

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

It is very important for Mr. Cook to keep up this facade, as once people learn of his lack of credentials and scientifically worthless employment history they are unlikely to take his website seriously no matter how he desperately pads his resume. As opposed to the highly credentialed climate scientists his staff harassed and censored;

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

It is very important for Mr. Cook to keep up this facade, as once people learn of his lack of credentials and scientifically worthless employment history they are unlikely to take his website seriously no matter how he desperately pads his resume. As opposed to the highly credentialed climate scientists his staff harassed and censored;

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Skeptical Science is a climate alarmist website created by a self-employed cartoonist, John Cook (who apparently pretends to be a Nazi). It is moderated by zealots who ruthlessly censor any and all form of dissent from their alarmist position. This way they can pretend to win arguments, when in reality they have all been refuted. The abuse and censorship does not pertain to simply any dissenting commentator there but to highly credentialed and respected climate scientists as well; Dr. Pielke Sr. has unsuccessfully attempted to engage in discussions there only to be childishly taunted and censored, while Dr. Michaels has been dishonestly quoted and smeared. The irony of the site's oxymoronic name "Skeptical Science" is that the site is not skeptical of even the most extreme alarmist positions.

John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no prior employment history in academia or climate science.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit you are a dishonest *********** ************.

Straight up.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

"Still no proof being OFFERED cowards."Tiredofit

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

You know I was thinking about this whole global warming thing being a hoax. As in why use the climate as a means of effecting change for whatever reason.

But if one thinks about it....why didn't they use the fact the fossil fuels are finite and will eventually run out to effect this change that Tiredofit it screams about?

Why use global warming as the "excuse". Especially that the real bad effects of global warming are still decades away?

Saying we need to get away from fossil fuels because they are running out would be a more believable and tangible excuse because the effects of it becoming more scarce is already being felt.

The effects of global warming aren't widespread yet.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still no proof being OFFERED cowards.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Discussing things with Tiredofit has proven futile.

He wants to play games? Then game on!

Posted 6 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or