Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

"New all-time satellite-era record for Antarctic sea ice extent"

Thats all good and well but what you fail to mention is thickness.

How does the thickness stack up against what has been the norm in the past?

No surprise you glossed over that FACT. LOL.

Posted 18 days ago.

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Answer these two questions first.

Come on Tiredofit you afraid to answer these questions?

Posted 18 days ago.

mythravere

Kevin Roeten. Highly biased. Neeeext.

Posted 18 days ago.

Kendall78

"No warming in 17 years lol but yet you still believe brother GORE"

That would be two lies.

1. There have been warming.

2. I never listened to Al Gore on this subject.

Why do you guess so wrong so much Tired?

OPh...please provide you definition of "proof" and "fact" if you really want information.

Otherwise it seems you are a blowhard.

Posted 18 days ago.

Kendall78

"Lets deal in facts..."

Please define what a "fact" is to you Tired because it's obviously not the same as what other people think.

Posted 19 days ago.

Kendall78

"that you have to go to a forum in a town you don't live in"

Odd that you say that of him since there is not one shred of evidence that you live around here.

Posted 19 days ago.

Kendall78

"inconvenient fact that the warming has ceased."

Well...that's a lie.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

Get it from the climate scientists. Study their papers. Write your own and subject it to peer review.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

What happened to the carbon tax issue you said you weren't buying? What's wrong with it? Have you even thought it through?

I haven't, but then again, I neither endorse nor reject it it.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

Why don't you take it up with the climate scientists whose conclusions you refuse to accept? They're the experts, not me.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

If you don't believe the experts, why would you believe me? I'm no expert. Are you? Are you a climate scientist? What have you published? Where? Why should I get my climate science from you? What are your credentials?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

Why are you dropping the carbon tax issue. When you brought it up, I assumed you wanted to discuss it. Turns out you'd rather talk about where I live.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

If you won't believe 97% of the most-published, most-reviewed climate scientists, why would you believe me?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

If you're not obsessed with where I live, why do you keep asking about it? It has nothing to do with the carbon tax issue you brought up.

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

Why does my quoting the Bible offend you so much, Tiredofit?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

Why are you so obsessed with where I live and who I am, Tiredofit?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

I choose not to reveal my real name or where I live. How about you?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

"advocate your carbon tax all you want, I wont buy into it."

I'm not advocating it. I'm seeking information.

So what is your objection to a carbon tax in which the revenue is used to reduce other taxes?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

What's this about "offsets"? Since you brought it up, how would it work?

Posted 19 days ago.

harryanderson

"why do you pollute this local forum Harry? You don't live here."

Always have to come back to your favorite subject, eh?

Posted 19 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or