Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
16 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Morby Dr. Tim Ball on April 29, 2015 in History,Philosophical,Political,Theory The world focus on CO2 is simply the end objective of a much larger political agenda. The Club of Rome (COR) and then UNEP’s Agenda 21 under Maurice Strong created a political agenda based on certain assumptions all related to overpopulation. - See more at: *******drtimball****/2015/co2-is-the-demon-because-malthus-and-ehrlich-were-wrong-about-overpopulation/#sthash.outDKPUk.dpufover Dr Ball states

Posted 51 days ago.

harryanderson

Some have overhyped global warming.

However, I can think of no climate scientist who denies that higher CO2 levels warm the earth.

Dr. Lindzen admits it.

Weekly Standard says:

“The burning of oil, gas, and especially coal pumps carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere, where they allow the sun’s heat to penetrate to the Earth’s surface but impede its escape, thus causing the lower atmosphere and the Earth’s surface to warm. Essentially everybody, Lindzen included, agrees.”

htt p://ww w.weeklystandard.co m/articles/what-catastrophe_773268.html?page=1

NY Times says:

"Dr. Lindzen accepts the elementary tenets of climate science. He agrees that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, calling people who dispute that point 'nutty.'”

“h ttp://w ww.nytimes.c om/2012/05/01/science/earth/clouds-effect-on-climate-change-is-last-bastion-for-dissenters.html?pagewanted=3&_r=0

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

He goes on to say so very accurately

“Global Warming has become a religion,” writes Lindzen. “A surprisingly large number of people seem to have concluded that all that gives meaning to their lives is the belief that they are saving the planet by paying attention to their carbon footprint.

Read more: *******dailycaller****/2013/08/29/mit-professor-global-warming-is-a-religion/#ixzz3cgTWCHBP

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

As reported on the dailycaller, dr richard lindzen clocks it pretty well

“Global climate alarmism has been costly to society, and it has the potential to be vastly more costly. It has also been damaging to science, as scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions,” writes Lindzen in the fall 2013 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

According to Lindzen, scientists make essentially “meaningless” claims about certain phenomenon. Activists for certain causes take up claims made by scientists and politicians respond to the alarmism spread by activists by doling out more research funding. — creating an “Iron Triangle” of poor incentives.

Read more: *******dailycaller****/2013/08/29/mit-professor-global-warming-is-a-religion/#ixzz3cgSsln42

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

But he has observed whatni have said all along, its a religion to you true beleivers

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

I feel the same about you kendall

Posted 51 days ago.

Kendall78

"Former Australian Prime Minister"

I'd care more about what he had to say if he was a climate scientist.

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard had some harsh words for global warming activists, saying they were “zealots” whose cause “has become a substitute religion.”

Read more: *******dailycaller****/2013/11/06/former-aussie-pm-zealots-believe-in-global-warming-as-a-substitute-religion/#ixzz3cfWIC7rX

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

Australia home of proven global warming huckster john Cook, Nuff said

Posted 51 days ago.

Kunectdots

"Climate Engineering Weather Warfare, and the Collapse of Civilization" - PLEASE SHARE!!

h ttps://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=5yZhh2leRJA

Posted 51 days ago.

Stillhere

Good point kunnec

Posted 51 days ago.

Ohwiseone

How soon we forget ! The whole premise of denying research by ole whiny pus$ was based on the fact that the research here was skewed by the government funding of said research ! So simply put , I found research that wasnt funded by our government ! There seems to be no answer to it eh ? lolol!

Posted 51 days ago.

Kunectdots

Australia??? Notice they ALSO said gun confiscation would result in a lower violent crime rate for their nation.

I bet the get sick of being right all the time. LOL

Here's a blast from the past (5 years ago). Ignore it at your peril. The Thinking Man might worry a little less about the oxidation of fossil fuels and more about INTENTIONAL human-created consequences.

"History Channel Weather Warfare Part One"

h ttps://w ww.youtube.c om/watch?v=l9igjGJP14o

Posted 52 days ago.

Stillhere

And yeah i have a stalker lol

Posted 52 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia Notice they say "will lead to widespread climate change ", not maybe , not some, but will !

Posted 52 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah yes the infamous "bury em in bullsh^t " tactic of the ole whiny pus$ troll !Some one must have said something that it just cant get by !

Posted 52 days ago.

Stillhere

Of course those that dont agree with him are somehow unqualified fir various reasons, some due to a precieved and nefarious motivation. However as soon as they sing from his hymnal, they are suddenly held up as examples of those that agree and i guess they "came to jesus". So to speak

Posted 52 days ago.

Stillhere

You see people like harry the fraud have no real proof of global warming so thier argument centers around an "everyone agrees with me" argument, hardly scientific. Any evidence that he does try to claim is remote and unobservable or silly things like Manns clasification of a handful of papers with a preconceived outcome. But yet he crows 97% of scientists agree with his socialist agenda a lie of epic proportions

Posted 52 days ago.

Stillhere

You people never cease to amaze me

Posted 52 days ago.

Stillhere

Don your robe harry and read us some scripture from Inconvenient truth

Posted 52 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or