Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
20 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

I guess the Global warming crowd is disappointed once again with the Supposed MEGA SNOW STORM lolololo Snowmegedon LOLOOLLLLL

Posted 98 days ago.

Stillhere

MOD

Why would they release a report saying in effect, "we have no idea" which is what they ARE saying.

Posted 99 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Sorry , I don't talk to liars !

Posted 99 days ago.

Stillhere

Mod how can one claim a rise that is half the margin of error?

Posted 99 days ago.

Stillhere

I see you bring your usual level of intellect to this debate Muster lolool

Cry for attention much?

IGNORE

Posted 99 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Doesn't matter whats said or facts presented mod , the tiredbrain troll will nit pick and deny ! That's all it does !Well,except tell lies !

Posted 99 days ago.

Stillhere

Uhhhh mod, there is no "interpretation" of the error bars! If you claim a .04c rise but admit you cannot be sure within +-.05, it MEANS NOTHING, just hype designed to create a perception that is not factual!

Posted 99 days ago.

moderation

"........."

Posted 99 days ago.

moderation

. All of these yield consistent estimates of the approximate magnitude of global warming, which now stands at about twice the magnitude that we reported in 1981. Further affirmation of the reality of the warming is its spatial distribution, which has largest values at locations remote from any local human influence, with a global pattern consistent with that expected for response to global climate forcings (larger in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere, larger at high latitudes than low latitudes, larger over land than over ocean).

Posted 99 days ago.

moderation

The " margin of error is just that.You interpret it to support only your position,tired.

Posted 99 days ago.

Stillhere

Take the recent announcement about 2014 being the warmest on record for instance. Leftists like Harry post it as fact, but somehow ignore the admitted margin of error for that study. If you take ADMITTED margin of error its hard to believe we have had warming at all and if we HAVE had any, there is no proof man is responsible.

Posted 100 days ago.

Stillhere

The truth? NO one will know as the moneyed interests are propaganda machines.

Posted 100 days ago.

Stillhere

Are there those in the fossil fuel industry that wish to influence science? I think without question, however what the "true believers" wont admit is that the hard left and their media sycophants have an agenda as well.

Posted 100 days ago.

Stillhere

Indeed the science has been corrupted by money and politics, I have no reservation in stating so.

Posted 100 days ago.

absolem

*that

Posted 100 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i understand your point regarding staying on topic but i could not resist in pointing out taht one action by some does not equal the same action..or reaction by others. such is politics and i think you will agree that politics has certainly tainted the honest science that should define the physical world around us.

Posted 100 days ago.

Stillhere

That IS THE TOPIC

Posted 101 days ago.

Stillhere

His obsession on global warming is

Posted 101 days ago.

Stillhere

His postings about Romney are not the subject of my interest

Posted 101 days ago.

absolem

Stillhere, i am familiar with Harry and his postings. he is correct in his points. his observation that the politicians job is to get elected spotlights the complexity of representing all interests. speaking a truth does not always lend itself to be an assertion of superiority. i do not read his statement in that fashion.

Posted 101 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or