Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

Calling me names doesn't make the facts disappear Tired.

Calling me names in hope of deflecting your own acts of ignorance won't work either.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"Well enlighten me Kendall on what caused the glacial period"

I'm not the one on here that is talking about the glacial period...that would be you. Do you have evidence of what exactly caused the glacial period? You sure do seem like a person that knows what doesn't cause stuff..lol.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"The fact is"

You have no idea what the facts are.

"you have nothing and you know it."

All the pages with citations in this thread says differently.

"the ends justify the means"

And what "ends" do you think I hoping for? Please feel free to cite my very quotes if you have the guts to try this ;)

"and even without proof you just think it would be a good idea"

Thankfully there is proof.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

TIRED...GO BACK THROUGH THE PAGES.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"but I CAN prove it was not manmade co2"

"Cannot prove a negative, geez you are dense"

Yes..yes you are very dense haha.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"that man had no SUVS or coal powered plants during the glacial period."

Not one person on here ever made a claim that they did.

Is this how you plan on winning an argument...telling what didn't exist during a time you know nothing about from a scientific standpoint?

You might want to reconsider that plan.

Posted 302 days ago.

mythravere

I'll say again. Our proof has already been outlined. Its in the comments scattered throughout this forum topic.

If you want them go reread all those posts.

But you won't you are just going to repeatedly ask for proof.

But thats ok. I can just as well refer you to the previous comments. Which is what I am going to do. Each and every time you ask.

Posted 302 days ago.

mythravere

"You are being laid bare with a simple question, thank you for representing your side so poorly.:)"

There is only one thing being laid bare. And its your dishonesty.

You are hiding behind a question.

Also any proof put on the table will be rejected no matter what..by you.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

Wouldn't it better serve your argument if you would prove your belief that the current climate change is due to a natural cycle devoid of unnatrual causes.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"Was man burning fossil fuels in the last ice age?"

You tell us, you seem to be an expert on what was or wasn't...lol.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"but I CAN prove it was not manmade co2"

You can prove something was "NOT" the cause of something?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Oh my gosh you are a card Tired. You rant on and on for multiple pages saying you cannot prove a negative and then you say something stupid like that.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"Ok where is the proof?"

I refer you back to pages 40-225 of this thread. You'll easily see them where you tried to deflect the evidence by saying it's all political like Louisiana state representative Lenar Whitney thinks it is as well.

Posted 302 days ago.

Ohwiseone

How about it tiredbrain ? Who's agenda are you putting forth ???

Posted 302 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ?????

Posted 302 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Much like global warming , this isn't going away by you burying your head up your rump !

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

@Harry- I agree...there are so many positives about reducing our need on fossil fuels in general. The long term pros for reducing our use on coal and oil far outweigh short term pros of relying on them.

Sometimes it seems like this all or nothing mentality with these arguments. I don't think any rational person that accepts man effects the climate actually expects the US to sudenly stop all coal production the the nation. That would be dumb.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"Nope never claimed I did"

Sooo...when you said it was just part of the natural cycle, you was speaking out you *ss?

Doesn't sound like you were being intellectually responsible.

Posted 302 days ago.

Kendall78

"DO YOU HAVE PROOF that CO2 produced by man is warming the planet?"

Yes and it's been provided.

Posted 302 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Its a really simple question ,.Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ?Much like global warming , this isn't going away by you burying your head up your rump !

Posted 302 days ago.

harryanderson

My livelihood depends on burning fossil fuel, and I'm not panicky over it.

Posted 302 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or