Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Ithink
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Why should we be concerned about GW, if it doesn't warm or cool us? We hardly have to worry about ocean overwash here in the WV hills. What's the big deal?

Posted 229 days ago.

mythravere

Dang when are you people going to get it that the warming does not translate into total warming of the planet. Sure the climate is heating up but that still doesn't mean that the polar areas of this planet are just stopping being cold.

They are still very cold and that is where this cold is coming from.

Posted 229 days ago.

Does it help keep people who are freezing warm, to tell them that they are really being heated? When is this warming going to get here? The warmists need to use their crystal balls and give us specfic dates. We are sick of snow.

Bring it on.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Fair NA

HumidityNA Wind SpeedSW 6 mph Barometer30.36 in DewpointNA Visibility10.00 mi Last

Hmm its not 104 no more but NA...what does NA mean. I know New America.

See there is a conspiracy.

AAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhh the end is nigh!

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

But lets make something clear first.

On the name calling. As soon as this issue started getting more coverage in the news and it was seen that it was topic that left would take under their wing what has been vomited forth out of right wing mouths.

That it is a communist socialist America hating (and I mean hating)America destroying attempt at world domination or some chit like that.

Try and defend it..guess what..get branded a socialist America hating evil.

So on that name calling...I didn't start that stuff.

Want civility then act civil including your participation in debates.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

So where was we. Oh yea arguing over he said she said right? Instead of the science surrounding this issue.

Since we are invariably talking of a vast conspiracy here lets delve into exactly what it would take to pull that off.

Its not like the science is locked away and hidden from view unable to be challenged.

Care to spew some untruths about that topic Tiredofit?

My guess is that you will whine more about scientific funding.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

An attempt was tried at having honest reasoned debate on this topic and no takers were found from your party.

Kind of hard to rebut what someone else is saying when the other party refuses to answer questions.

I'm done rebutting you fools. I have no issue stepping down to your level.

Posted 230 days ago.

Tiredofit

Clearly hes reduced to name calling and stupid impressions, errrrr Shorty, those don't work on a text forum.... And he thinks others are the dumb ones......ahhh

Posted 230 days ago.

Tiredofit

Um no you freaking idiot. God how stupid are you.

It was actually nice when you stopped posting on here. THIS is a master rebuttal from a master debator and SHORT BUS CLIMATOLIGIST, our own special needs buddy MYTH. He thinks OTHERS are the dumb ones, ahhhhhhh

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Thatsabsurd the Elmer Fudd of climate change deniers.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Dur Dee Dur oh wookie NOOOA has the wrong temperature listed...must be a conspiracy. Dur dee Dur!

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

So I am just guessing here but when you say "imbecile" thatsabsurd do you just say it or do emphasise imbe and then let cile roll off your tongue like a Frenchman?

If so then that would be funny.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

imbecile...When you say that in my minds eye I pretend that its gollum from the Lord of The Rings saying that....so dang funny and probably not far from the truth..cave dweller and all.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

imbecile.....lol lol

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Thatsabsurd when you call me an imbecile I wear that as a badge of honor.

For real though....its hilarious when say that.

"What would be the point for NOAA to alter temp data when there are all these other sources of temp data that would conflict with what they say?"

So what say you about this thatsabsurd?

Posted 230 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

"Only a fool would latch onto what NOAA is saying"

Myth you still are an imbecile..........NOAA is the provider of the models that your "Climate Scientists" get so much of their data from. (Albeit "deliberately" altered data)

thank you for pointing that out to us you hypocrite.

Go fold your tin-foil hat---- your type are no longer having any effect on those cable of real science................

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Also the weather underground website is listing the proper temps for Parkersburg right now.

What would be the point for NOAA to alter temp data when there are all these other sources of temp data that would conflict with what they say?

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

And lets talk of this "conspiracy" by climate scientists.

Have any of you denying dillweeds ever thought that Heh maybe what I think isn't too plausible because you know what.

Everything the scientists are saying is auditable. It can be scrutinized by outside parties if need be.

Maybe that needs to done to make you numbskulls shutup?

Pray tell an oil company would have enough money to make that happen wouldn't they? Wonder why they haven't done that?

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

"So if climatology is exaggerating for what if not money?"

What if and I do mean what if the powers that be knew the end date for when fossil fuels ran out? And it was in the maybe not near future but somewhat close future like 20 years.

If they are lying about it that'd be the only reason. Because to announce something like that would cause the world to tear itself apart. Can you imagine how many countries would take off on a warpath to secure energy supplies?

Trying to get people to make the switch to renewables willingly would be a better way.

Posted 230 days ago.

mythravere

Did you ever think that there could possibly be something wrong with the website. Because in the past I have seen the same exact thing happen for a short while.

Every single time the temperature was 104.

Technical issue anyone?

Posted 230 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or