Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 minutes ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"I am still waiting for one prediction that came to fruition that can be proven to be as result of co2"

Predicting the future does not make something true. If that was the case, you should be able to predict the future of climate studies because you have access to the political makeup of the nation.

So go ahead Tired, predict what the climate is going to be by politics. If what you imply is true about politics directing the information on climate change, this should be easy for you.

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 165 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit is the perfect example of someone with selective thinking.

Not to mention having a very high degree of confirmation bias and attitude polarization and belief perseverance.

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

"Only someone like you tiredofit would think Kendall was talking about a car heating up a garage and killing a person."

Thank you myth, pity it will just fly over his head.

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

"You fail to grasp the fact that it's the CO that displaces oxygen just like nitrogen and kills a person."

And the end result is the same, the burning of fossil fuel can kill you.

Posted 165 days ago.

mythravere

I think the whole point around Kendall mentioning a car in a closed garage is that the carbon monoxide from the exhaust which comes from the burning of hydrocarbons would kill a person.

Only someone like you tiredofit would think Kendall was talking about a car heating up a garage and killing a person.

But then again you do like to deflect a lot.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

You analogy is weak and inaccurate. Being run over by my car would not prove fossil fuels killed you.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

You fail to grasp the fact that it's the CO that displaces oxygen just like nitrogen and kills a person. It doesn't make my garage warmer. It's the convective heat from the fird that warms it not carbon. Save your childish insults

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

I do not see how anything I have said was hateful at all. You seem like a person that cannot grasp the obvious without extreme measures.

If you had been in the military, I am quite certain you would have been the "Private Pyle" of your platoon and need all the help the Sgt could give you.

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

"Science can predict outcomes."

Yes it can. So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

It's encouraging that you can grasp gravity Tired. Now if you could expand your mind to the understanding of climate change and global warming. We will pray for you.

Since you answered with silence on the topic and childishly tried to switch the topic, I will assume you agree that fossil fuels can cause something negative to the human body.

If you disagree, feel free to try and correct it if you are able.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

Science can predict outcomes. For instance we know that you would fall 16 ft the first second and accelerate at a rate of 32 ft/Sec squared from there on. Myth I'll splain it to ya later.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

Belpre bridge that is

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

Why jmmy what a hateful thing to say, I am hurt. I would tell you to take a flying leap from the belpre but you would only learn gravity or water was causing global warming.

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

"Show me the proof that fossil fuel caused anything."

Go park a car in an airtight garage and keep it on. Just stay there for awhile and see of the burning of fossil fuels have any bad results. We'll wait here for your response ;)

Posted 165 days ago.

Kendall78

"I am still waiting for one prediction that came to fruition that can be proven to be as result of co2"

Predicting the future does not make something true. If that was the case, you should be able to predict the future of climate studies because you have access to the political makeup of the nation.

So go ahead Tired, predict what the climate is going to be by politics. If what you imply is true about politics directing the information on climate change, this should be easy for you.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok NOW it's nil.LO,L

Posted 165 days ago.

mythravere

"Your childish taunts only further you lack of credibility which is almost nil."

So says the guy who skews the words of others for his own benefit. LOL!

Posted 165 days ago.

mythravere

Thats not a taunt dimwit.

Posted 165 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok, that was far too easy but it's the best ya got thanks. NEXT

Posted 165 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or