Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 days ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

It comes from the same source that warmed us out of the ice age not man

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

No it's not obvious that it is, you just think it might be

Posted 79 days ago.

Kendall78

"And not a bit of what you say can be linked to a man made cause."

Where do you come up with that? It's obvious it does. Why are you unable to comprehend that?

Maybe if you could give your evidence that clearly shows that all the climate change we have been discussing comes solely from another source...can you? I highly doubt it.

Posted 79 days ago.

Kendall78

Stillhere, learn to use quotation marks in the future if you are going to quote someone. Learn the basics.

Nah, you are wrong about the margin of error. Try again.

".8c rise from 1880, margin of error +- .1 C."

Wait, are you trying to say that .1 > .8? Because with the margin of error even included...it's still a rise.

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

Take it up with NASSA ;)

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

.8c rise from 1880, margin of error +- .1 C.

Wrong again harry

Posted 79 days ago.

harryanderson

"The total warming is within the margin of error."

Wrong.

The total warming is far outside the margin of error. When you add data points to a set, the cumulative error decreases. We now have 135 data points, or years, in the record, so the margin of error is very small.

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

Warming stopped nearly two decades ago and it's you who has no answer other than to say it magically only hears water now, Ridiculous!

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

I notice you use 1.4f rather than .08 C. I guess it just seems bigger. So what do error bars mean to you? They admit they cannot say with certainty what the temps were in the period in question and the claimed warming is less than the uncertainty of historical temps.

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

And not a bit of what you say can be linked to a man made cause. And the total warming is within the margin of error. So sorry but those are the facts

Posted 79 days ago.

Stillhere

»Report Abuse Kendall78 "Most of the southern slave owners were republicans !"

Evidence? I'm just curious how your conjured up that statement.

if you'll notice that's an ohwiseone quote, ask him where he got that little gem

Posted 79 days ago.

harryanderson

Quite, Kendall.

Since 1880, global surface temperatures have increased 1.4 degrees F., which is enough to upend the balance on which we depend.

According to NASA:

“Global sea level rose about 17 centimeters (6.7 inches) in the last century. The rate in the last decade, however, is nearly double that of the last century.”

“The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have decreased in mass.”

“Both the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice has declined rapidly over the last several decades.”

“The number of record high temperature events in the United States has been increasing, while the number of record low temperature events has been decreasing, since 1950. The U.S. has also witnessed increasing numbers of intense rainfall events.”

htt p://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

NASA lists others.

The earth’s climate is like a baby. A few degrees of temperature rise disrupts it.

Posted 80 days ago.

Kendall78

"Earth’s average surface temperature has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit"

What's the difference between 33 degrees and 31.6 degrees...the difference between solid and liquid.

What's the difference if you are one inch from the cliff's edge or one inch beyond the cliff's edge? Falling to your death.

What's the difference between saying a small word like "yes" or "no" when your significant others asks, "Does this make me look fat?"

A small difference can mean all the difference Stillhere.

Posted 80 days ago.

Kendall78

"lets start with the admitted maring of errpr in NASSA data"

And how does that disprove all the facts showing climate change due to humanity is happening?

That's right...it doesn't.

You seem to lean on ignorance as your main answer to everything. I suppose you also believe in the God of the Gaps. You obviously have no real scientific answer to why the climate is changing, so you approach the problem with your head in the sand and basically say, "Nope...not happening..nope nope...not happening."

Posted 80 days ago.

Kendall78

"Most of the southern slave owners were republicans !"

Evidence? I'm just curious how your conjured up that statement.

Posted 80 days ago.

Ohwiseone

See that's your problem dingle berry ! You just believe you're so superior when the reality is you're just another lying troll that does nothing but repeat your parties official line !

Posted 80 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And was this data non- partisan ?

Posted 80 days ago.

Stillhere

Easy to see why he cannot comment on the issue at hand or understand the math involved

Posted 80 days ago.

Stillhere

Ohwiseone

Most of the southern slave owners were republicans !

THIS is the brilliance of our friend NOTSOWISEONE.

Posted 80 days ago.

Stillhere

I am citing NASSA data, you are spewing hatefulness about me, LOL yep

Posted 80 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or