Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

The topic Harrry is man causing global warming try to stay on YOUR TOPIC

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability.  Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.

Posted 10 hours ago.

harryanderson

So far the score is 6 scientists who claim CO2 is a greenhouse gas (including Lindzen) and none who say it isn't.

Now, do you agree or disagree?

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Finally, in attributing warming to man, they fail to point out that the warming has been small, and totally consistent with there being nothing to be alarmed about.

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Hmmm no warming in 17 years yet co2 levels rise

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean.  However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans.  However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability.  Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.

Posted 10 hours ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit, you wrote, "When your case is complete, I will agree or disagree but not until then"

When will you keep this promise? I said CO2 was a greenhouse gas. Do you agree or disagree?

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

I agree with the good Dr, of course the earth has warmed lest we have glaciers across the mid west, however he does testify there has been no warming in 17 yrs.

Posted 10 hours ago.

harryanderson

“they fail to point out that the warming has been small”

Checkmate

Lindzen, in addition to admitting CO2 is a greenhouse gas, also admits that the earth has warmed. He disagrees on the amount of warming, but says it has warmed.

I said CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and your post from Lindzen backs me up.

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Well just call that check mate

Posted 10 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Rut ro harry

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Hmmmm

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Lindzen has published more than 200 scientific papers and books. He was a lead author of Chapter 7, ‘Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks,’ of the IPCC Third Assessment Report on climate change.

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Finally, in attributing warming to man, they fail to point out that the warming has been small, and totally consistent with there being nothing to be alarmed about.  It is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going.

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot on September 27, 2013: I think that the latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence.  They are proclaiming increased confidence in their models as the discrepancies between their models and observations increase. Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean.  However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans.  However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability.  Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Since you CANNOT make the case, we will assume that there is no crisis nora reason to submit to the socialist left big government plan, good to know

Posted 11 hours ago.

Tiredofit

Thank you for admitting you cannot make the case for the very title of your thread.

Posted 11 hours ago.

Ohwiseone

TOTAL WHACK JOB !!!

Posted 12 hours ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit, you once again demand proof. Yet, according to your definitions, proof of climate change is impossible. You wrote, “Proof is a concept that is really only applicable in mathematics, because math deals with abstract concepts and definitions.” So, to you, if a piece of evidence is real, rather than abstract, that evidence doesn’t count.

You also gave another absurd definition that deals with real, rather than abstract, phenomena. You wrote, “To be proven, something needs to be demonstrable and repeatable.” So, to you, the past temperature record doesn’t count because it isn’t “repeatable.”

Bottom line: Nothing real counts to you. The only thing that matters is what you dream up.

Posted 12 hours ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or