Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 minutes ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

You boys lose, deflect with the 97% that I have already destroyed

Posted 135 days ago.

Kendall78

"It is also the radiation absorbed by CO2."

Soooo...you agree that CO2 absorbs radiation. Therefor more CO2 should absorbed even more radiation..right?

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

This radiation is strongly absorbed by matter, and will not pass through glass.  It is also the radiation absorbed by CO2.

Posted 135 days ago.

Kendall78

"even if 97% of the most-credible experts in the field are wrong."

But no one has shown that the 97% is incorrect. You just have misplaced faith that they are.

"when you start with the name-calling."

Hmm, there is a term that fits in with this about you Tired...oh yeah..hypocrite. That's the behavior you are performing right now..that of a hypocrite.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

Hello?..

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

This radiation is strongly absorbed by matter, and will not pass through glass.  It is also the radiation absorbed by CO2.

Posted 135 days ago.

harryanderson

No, I think I made myself clear. As you said, I "don't understand why HOW you heat something might be important."

Why don't you explain it to me?

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

It matters because you are trying to model the universe, if the basic premise is flawed the results are as well, geez

Posted 135 days ago.

Kendall78

Adam and Eve has nothing to do with the topic. Quit deflecting.

From the very blog you cited Tired, it says that certain infared radition passes through glass. That means you are wrong.

The blog you cited also says that CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

CO2 has been shown to increase the ability of the atmosphere to retain heat energy.

There is no connection between elections and the discussion of Global Warming. If there was, then the Republicans would be winning more positions than they have.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh harry slave to science, tell us

Posted 135 days ago.

harryanderson

Still won't say why it matters, eh, Tiredofit? Just quit and claim victory.

I don't care who wins or loses myself. That's why I'm not, as you wrongly claim, "upset." I know I'll be okay even if 97% of the most-credible experts in the field are wrong.

That's why I don't reciprocate when you start with the name-calling.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

One more time for the stupidThis radiation is strongly absorbed by matter, and will not pass through glass.  It is also the radiation absorbed by CO2.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh do tell us how Jesus rose from the dead, is that science?

Posted 135 days ago.

Kendall78

@Harry- I still think saying he willfully has his head in the sand is pretty spot on.

He doesn't answer any questions that makes him look bad. I asked him multiple times a very straight forward question but he won't answer it because it would hurt his position.

He can't even be bothered with reading the very blog he takes some selective info from. It even says that there is infared radiation that goes through glass but he won't accept that either.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

So do tell harry, about Adam and eve

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh harry you don't deny science?????// lol

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

Done with you, if you cannot understand HOW you heat something might be important if you are trying to model the sun, wow you are a obtuse.

Posted 135 days ago.

harryanderson

"...a fraudulent science denying jerk who has no connection to our hometown wastes his time with."

That statement is not true. Just another claim you can't back up.

Posted 135 days ago.

Tiredofit

I have shown your expirament to be quite flawed, and that upsets you as a fraudulent republican who believes the world was created in six days gets calls others science deniers, what a tool.

Posted 135 days ago.

harryanderson

Do I think it's accurate? It seems so to me. I don't see why it makes any difference HOW you heat the gasses. And, it seems, you're unable to tell me why.

Posted 135 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or