Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
22 minutes ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Answer these two questions first.

Come on Tiredofit you afraid to answer these questions?

Posted 294 days ago.

mythravere

Kevin Roeten. Highly biased. Neeeext.

Posted 294 days ago.

Kendall78

"No warming in 17 years lol but yet you still believe brother GORE"

That would be two lies.

1. There have been warming.

2. I never listened to Al Gore on this subject.

Why do you guess so wrong so much Tired?

OPh...please provide you definition of "proof" and "fact" if you really want information.

Otherwise it seems you are a blowhard.

Posted 294 days ago.

Kendall78

"Lets deal in facts..."

Please define what a "fact" is to you Tired because it's obviously not the same as what other people think.

Posted 295 days ago.

Kendall78

"that you have to go to a forum in a town you don't live in"

Odd that you say that of him since there is not one shred of evidence that you live around here.

Posted 295 days ago.

Kendall78

"inconvenient fact that the warming has ceased."

Well...that's a lie.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

Get it from the climate scientists. Study their papers. Write your own and subject it to peer review.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

What happened to the carbon tax issue you said you weren't buying? What's wrong with it? Have you even thought it through?

I haven't, but then again, I neither endorse nor reject it it.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

Why don't you take it up with the climate scientists whose conclusions you refuse to accept? They're the experts, not me.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

If you don't believe the experts, why would you believe me? I'm no expert. Are you? Are you a climate scientist? What have you published? Where? Why should I get my climate science from you? What are your credentials?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

Why are you dropping the carbon tax issue. When you brought it up, I assumed you wanted to discuss it. Turns out you'd rather talk about where I live.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

If you won't believe 97% of the most-published, most-reviewed climate scientists, why would you believe me?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

If you're not obsessed with where I live, why do you keep asking about it? It has nothing to do with the carbon tax issue you brought up.

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

Why does my quoting the Bible offend you so much, Tiredofit?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

Why are you so obsessed with where I live and who I am, Tiredofit?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

I choose not to reveal my real name or where I live. How about you?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

"advocate your carbon tax all you want, I wont buy into it."

I'm not advocating it. I'm seeking information.

So what is your objection to a carbon tax in which the revenue is used to reduce other taxes?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

What's this about "offsets"? Since you brought it up, how would it work?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

"why do you pollute this local forum Harry? You don't live here."

Always have to come back to your favorite subject, eh?

Posted 295 days ago.

harryanderson

I've come back to play a little more, Tiredofit. Where were we?

Oh, I remember. You brought up the carbon tax issue, and I said I'd give you some time to think about it.

So now, what do you think of a tax on carbon that is 100% percent offset by a cut in business and personal income taxes?

Posted 295 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or