Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

But we shall stick to GLOBAL warming and your complete lack of proof.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

calling a bluff implies you have a better hand or more chips. I GUESS YOU DONT UNDERSTAND POKER EITHER.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

All those socialist well paid climatologists and still no proof, I would be embarrassed too if were you. Run away boy, I am done with ya anyway

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Cannot prove a negative. How many times must you be told, but its a cop out because you have nothing and cannot admit it.

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

I never said once that the govt needs more power.

Why do you lie so much?

Time for dinner...have fun with those citations you are going to post. :D

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

I challenge your historic norms, you have NO CARDS you lose. Again you can site all the propaganda sites you want, still NO PROOF lol is that so hard for you to understand. PROPOGANDA IS NOT PROOF

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

I will tell you what....I will again cite my information when you do.

That seems fair right?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no doubt you believe this stuff, and for those that are gullible, its been easy for the media and the socialist left to convince them that GOVT needs more power to save us from C02

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

Actually you have shown nothing, that's your problem. And you seem to have a short term memory issue too.

Look back through the many many pages and you will see where I cite information many many time.

You will also see where you never cite information many many timesbut still make claims.

Remember, calling a bluff implies you have a better hand or more chips. You have neither. ;)

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

You toss around words like HISTORIC NORMS yet you don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about. LOL

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Like I have shown many many time. You don't have any proof whatsoever. You WANT it to be true, YOU HOPE its true and you have well paid people saying its likely but NO PROOF

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Call your bluff, you show yourself every time. LESSON 2 over

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

uh huh lol knew you didn't have it .ololol

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"show me the data"

Why? You won't accept it. You already have said that many times in many different ways.

Is that why you don't give proof because even you don't believe it?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Struggle all you want with your "but its gotta be true" argument but at the end of the day, you don't have anything but what you BELEIVE or WANT to be true.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have yet to show that a tiny trace gas is a leading indicator of change rather than a lagging indicator of warming

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

YOu can try to link all kind of things but where is the proof???? You STILL have shown NONE.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

and you base "historic norms" on what???? show me the data

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"NO more proof than any other warming or cooling cycle were man made"

Except that this warming trend does not fall into the historical norms. The only different factor is the industrialization of society brought by mankind.

Again, if you have another provable possibility...show us your proof and we will consider it. Otherwise, why are you wasting your time?

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

"I don't have to prove they are not, cannot prove a negative"

I have never once EVER asked you to prove a negative. I have many times to prove your unsaid assertion that something else is causing the current climate change. You have not done that.

I also asked you to show that CO2 doesn't have the properties of a "greenhouse gas" but that it has the properties of a safe gas. You have not. I don't think you can.

Posted 7 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or