Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Time to start the weekend, have a good one.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh Kendall, argue with your little buddies at Chucky Cheese this weekend.

Posted 35 days ago.

Kendall78

"Clearly there is a demonstrable bias there.."

And yet you have not demonstrated such bias anywhere.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

That wasn't the article to which I referred. I meant the article about falsifying the temperature record. Did you read it and find bias?

Posted 35 days ago.

Kendall78

"Why, it's a PolitiFact ruling from June, 2012 that calls this very same statement "half true.""

It appears your reading comprehension isn't up to par Tired. Read the whole article and then read the one about the Lie of the Year and you might understand.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Clearly there is a demonstrable bias there and it's biased the way you like I guess. Have at it, just don't think it's an UN biased arbiter of fact.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry, if you want to site politifact as your source of record go right ahead, just don't expect me to ignore the obvious bias that it represents.

Posted 35 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired, can you prove that the Times is influencing Politicfact?

Yes or No

Can you show that Politicfact behaves in a manner that is not professional?

Yes or No

From what I have seen from you and others, Politifact checks it's sources ans tries to contact those their articles are about. They rate both Conservatives and Liberals with the same scrutiny. If you are able to prove otherwise, please do. Otherwise you have failed to prove your argument.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

So they cover for him until he no longer has to face voters and try to reclaim any credibility they might have left

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

DAILY kos

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

But what's that, over there on the right side of that PolitiFact page? Under "related rulings"? Why, it's a PolitiFact ruling from June, 2012 that calls this very same statement "half true." Obama has a reasonable point: His health care law does take pains to allow Americans to keep their health plan if they want to remain on it. But Obama suggests that keeping the insurance you like is guaranteed.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry what rating did they originally give Obama on that very statement?

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

So have you read the article and found bias in it?

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

For president of the United States, the Tampa Bay Times recommends Barack Obama.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ahhhhhh yes but Since 2000, the Times has issued 10 endorsements in elections for U.S. President, U.S. Senate, and Florida Governor. Nine of the 10 endorsements went to Democrats, with the sole exception being the Times? endorsement of Democrat-leaning Independent Charlie Crist in the 2010 U.S. Senate contest.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

And as far as Politicact being "in the tank for Obama," I don't believe that. Politifact did give him their " lie of the year award." In view of that, how can you claim they're "in the tank" for him?

Posted 35 days ago.

Kendall78

If you actually did any research Tired, you will see that Politifact has found 54% of Obama stuff as half true, mostly false, false or pants on fire.

That sort of blows your conspiracy theory out doesn't it?

@Harry- it's apparent that he doesn't read much of anything beyond headlines

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

Apparently you didn't read the article. If you had, you would know what famous skeptic said Goddard was wrong.

Posted 35 days ago.

Tiredofit

Politiffact is run by the Tampa bay Times who endorsed Obama "without hesitation" so do forgive my incredulity.

Posted 35 days ago.

Kendall78

"And why shouldn't that source be credible?"

How about you tell us why it should.

Posted 35 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or