Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
39 minutes ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

and you base "historic norms" on what???? show me the data

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"NO more proof than any other warming or cooling cycle were man made"

Except that this warming trend does not fall into the historical norms. The only different factor is the industrialization of society brought by mankind.

Again, if you have another provable possibility...show us your proof and we will consider it. Otherwise, why are you wasting your time?

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"I don't have to prove they are not, cannot prove a negative"

I have never once EVER asked you to prove a negative. I have many times to prove your unsaid assertion that something else is causing the current climate change. You have not done that.

I also asked you to show that CO2 doesn't have the properties of a "greenhouse gas" but that it has the properties of a safe gas. You have not. I don't think you can.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

So the rise in temperatures during the last 100 years is not proof?

NO more proof than any other warming or cooling cycle were man made

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have NO PROOF. You have opinion and models and words like LIKELY but you have NO PROOF or you would have offered it.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

The TEMPS rising is not proof of Man caused warming LOL NO geez

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"That's why you are losing the argument."

What argument am I losing? I back up my assertions with research and cite that information.

You....don't.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Don't need any, YOU have to prove that MAN is causing Global Warming I don't have to prove they are not, cannot prove a negative

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"but that IS NOT PROOF"

So the rise in temperatures during the last 100 years is not proof?

Curious, what would you consider proof? Don't deflect...answer the question because I think everyone would be interested in knowing what you consider to be proof.

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"SO KENDALL IS MORE..."

Ignoring the childish screaming, I never once said I was more intelligent than her. But facts have very little to do with her comment now doesn't it?

No where in her comment does she state that she can prove that scientists exgaggerate. Also, in no way does her comments show that mankind does not effect climate change.

So Tired, you are still left without any evidence supporting your position. Back to square 1 with you.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

You may parse words if you like Kendall, so if MIGHT doesn't mean will, Likely does not mean WILL or DOES. Agreed.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its the attitude that exaggeration is just ok if it leads to more funding

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's why you are losing the argument. You try to pretend you have proof but you don't. the IPCC doesn't even claim proof, they say its very likely, but that IS NOT PROOF

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate"

See that word "might". Some similiar words are: perhaps or imaginably.

So just because they "might" does not mean they do. You have to prove that they (the entire global warming community) exaggerate. Good luck.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Where is the PROOF?????? WHat you believe or think is likely is NOT SCIENTIFIC PROOF get that through your socialist head

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Likely is opinion

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Must be awfully comfortable having your head up your keister , you seem to stay in that position a lot !

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

"Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal."

- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change~~~~~~~ The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years. NASA

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

SO KENDALL IS MORE EDUCATED THAN HARVARD GRAD AND DIRECTOR OF NOAA CLIAMTE PROJECT HUH, SOMEHOW I DOUBT THAT.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

KENNDALL SAYS No it's not a matter of opinion. You are more then welcome to give your uneducated opinion on what you think it means but that's why it's an opinion; you don't understand it and are guessing.

Posted 6 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or