Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
24 minutes ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"MSNBC's far-Left bias isn't working out so well"

Exactly what do you want more? Factual information or the journalistic version of panem et circenses?

Of course the unwashed masses likes the entertainment news that has a lot of yelling and flashes of women's legs than borning ol facts. Doesn't mean they are more intelligent or up to speed on what is important in the world.

Posted 205 days ago.

mythravere

People like Tiredofit can never be convinced of the truth.

Even if they know that what you are saying is true...they will deny it.

Posted 205 days ago.

mythravere

The only reason they take issue with man made climate change is because of political reasons.

The reason they find it wrong is because its something put on the table by the left. And that is the only thing they need to know to say that it is false,lie,a fraud or whatever.

The facts surrounding the issue are meaningless. Because no matter how much you try to show them the truth...no matter how many facts of theirs are refuted...everything you say is a lie and the facts about the issue that support its truthfulness are false.

Posted 205 days ago.

harryanderson

I suspect some here won’t accept the evidence that we have presented because they receive only information from sources who mislead them. A recent study from the Union of Concerned Scientists analyzed cable news networks’ climate change stories for evidence of misinformation. They found:

CNN was accurate 2/3 of the time.

Fox News was only accurate 28% of the time, with half of the misinformation coming from a single show—The Five.

MSNBC was the most accurate at 92%, “with some overstatements.”

htt p://****ucsusa.or g/global_warming/solutions/fight-misinformation/cable-news-coverage-climate-change-science.html

Posted 205 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! Tiredofit you know what it means.

Posted 205 days ago.

Kendall78

Why Ithink? Are you saying that global warming is happening but there is no one that knows why?

Posted 206 days ago.

If someone states what causes "global warming", Kendall, it needs to be labeled fiction.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

Only one person running from questions here Tired...and that would be you.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it because you are focusing on "knob polishing": So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 206 days ago.

mythravere

I haven't slinked off nowhere. Just got lost in a rather gory film.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

I guess I'm worth the bandwidth after all...haha.

Curious, do you not see yourself as a keyboard hero? After all, this is the only battlefield you ever fought on. I simply offer you a more direct chance to voice your opinions on global warming and you cower from it. Can't say I am surprise by your actions.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

I already know you won't come Tired, so I wish to you a blissful evening in the security of your own ignorance.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

"but calling a person a coward in text is hardly the act of a man"

Would you rather I called it to your face? If you wish, come down to Buffalo Wild Wings around 10:30 tonight. I'll buy you a beer if you are old enough.

Maybe then you will answer the questions I've asked.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

"You are not worth my bandwidth"

Translation: You are too cowardly and/or ignorant to answer.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

"I am still waiting for one prediction that came to fruition that can be proven to be as result of co2"

Predicting the future does not make something true. If that was the case, you should be able to predict the future of climate studies because you have access to the political makeup of the nation.

So go ahead Tired, predict what the climate is going to be by politics. If what you imply is true about politics directing the information on climate change, this should be easy for you.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

All I see from you Tired is a bunch of denial and cowardness. It's always easy to say what isn't, after all...you do that everyday you are on here.

But you never have the nerve or bravery to state what is causing global warming. Of course you will parrot more about the temp not rising in the last 17 years but then like a coward you ignore that the last 17 years have been more hot then the 17 years that came before it.

So, if not due to mankind...can you PROVE there is another factor to explain where the increased heat came from?

Please do not embarrass yourself by deflecting. Either you can or you cannot.

Posted 206 days ago.

Kendall78

"they are moronic"

I only use examples that suit the person they are aimed at.

Posted 206 days ago.

mythravere

You do that sport! LOL! What knob polisher!

Posted 206 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or