Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
10 minutes ago.
by harryanderson
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Who is desperate? The sky is falling warmers, of course.

Posted 254 days ago.

Another day of weather. It is not climate change, of course. It does seem to drain the brains of the warmers. Lots of laughs when people are suffering from the current lack of warming.

Posted 254 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit is comparing apples to oranges. In talking about “purchasing science,” the real point is purchasing results.

In my citation, receiving money depends on results: to “emphasize the shortcomings of (the 2007 IPCC report.)”

He cited what the government will spend “global warming research” this year. He would have you overlook the real point—purchasing results.

I cited an example where money would be paid on the condition the receiver UNDERMINE the IPCC. In contrast, he cited no examples where government money will be paid on the condition the grantee SUPPORT the IPCC. It’s ridiculous to even think the current House would appropriate money for such a grant.

One cannot honestly compare money spent reducing the uncertainty to money spent creating doubt about the IPCC 2007 result. To do so is comparing apples to oranges, and shows the counter climate change movement’s “enormous frustration” with “the scientific debate.”

Desperate folks distort the dope.

Posted 254 days ago.

mythravere

Oh my! I just thought of the perfect name for it.

Drum roll.....THE IMBECILICUS!

Whew boy that should get your juices flowing eh?

Posted 254 days ago.

mythravere

Oh by the way just for kicks let me tell you something.

If I were the tin foil hat wearing type of person I wouldn't wear a tin foil hat.

No I'd use my brain and ingenuity to build a hat out of wire mesh of various sizes that surrounded my entire head. I would then engineer special cooper soles for my shoes so that I could then ground my hat out properly. A wire running up each leg that would then tie in with a single wire going up my back to the hat should prove to be a good design.

Ever heard of a faraday cage? Thats what would be my inspiration.

So chew on that! Whahahahahaa!

Posted 254 days ago.

mythravere

I bet if I were to meet you thatsabsurd I would quickly find out that you are a mouth breather!

Posted 254 days ago.

mythravere

Oh god you are such a dingbat! LOL!

I dont know Thatsabsurd but if I were a scientist who was looking at the data and I seen that lake water temps were showing 400 degrees I think I would conclude that there was glitch in the system somewhere.

But just like NOAA showing the temperature at 104 for Parkersburg you latch onto obvious errors in the system whether it be software or hardware related and run with it.

Please by all means keep doing that. Because it makes you horrendously stupid when you do that.

Imbecile out! LOL!

Posted 254 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

"myth says" LOL! The deniers see 95 percent off and they immediately think in their minds that the difference between the observed temps and the modeled temps is like the difference between one and a hundred.

Last time they were off they recorded the Great Lakes "water" at over 400 degrees LOL and all those (well most about 95%) of the tin-foil hat wearing imbeciles couldn't tell you what happens to water at 212 degrees LOL and they still can't............but will look you dead in the eye and tell you their science proves it LOL

Idiots your not intelligent enough to be called an imbecile

Posted 254 days ago.

harryanderson

In spite of the counter climate change movement’s offers to purchase science, “the scientific debate is of enormous frustration to (them)”, according to Joe Bast, mogul of the Heartland Institute.

Posted 254 days ago.

harryanderson

“Purchased science?”

I’ve heard of that. Back in 2007, the American Enterprise Institute tried to purchase science. They offered $10,000 plus expenses to scientists who would publish papers undermining the findings of the IPCC.

“Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an ExxonMobil-funded thinktank with close links to the Bush administration, offered the payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

“Travel expenses and additional payments were also offered.”

htt p://ww w.theguardian.co m/environment/2007/feb/02/frontpagenews.climatechange

Yep. That counter climate change movement has the money to purchase science.

Posted 254 days ago.

I intended to just ignore your post Kendall. Just too dumb. But listening to constitutional lawyer J Turley on Megyn Kelly's show makes me incredulous that you don't know any better. He is a democrat,too.

And Greta had congressmen tonight talking about obama's lawlessness. Open your ears.

By the way, Greta and Megyn are both brillliant lawyers.

As long as we have a blind on purpose senate, he will get by with his dictatorial rulings.

Posted 255 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! The deniers see 95 percent off and they immediately think in their minds that the difference between the observed temps and the modeled temps is like the difference between one and a hundred.

One being the observed temps and a hundred being the modeled temps.

Sorry but the truth is more nuanced than that.

Nuance something the right has not a clue about.

Its either black or white for them no pun intended.

Posted 255 days ago.

mythravere

Goodness! LOL!

The models may be off but there still is an upward trend in temperatures!

Sure 95 percent are off but what is the spread of them being off from the actual observations? Some of them show a wide divergence but some are not that far off from the observed temperatures.

Leave it to the deniers to make a huge freaking deal out of this its so****funny!

Posted 255 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

help me help me I'm melting........!!!!!!!

Boy have the accountants who have "self-proclaimed" they are "Climate Scientist" doing the back-pedaling now..LOL Can you believe the imbeciles wearing their tin-foil hats will still tout the effects of Global warming because of AWG

DO YOU KNOW ANY ON HERE! LOL

Imbecile is too high an intellect for these idiots.

Posted 255 days ago.

Kendall78

"The president keeps on unlawfully changing the law. When will he ever be impeached or punished?"

What has he done that is unlawful? If he had, obviously the other 2 branches of govt would have stepped in but have they? No. And why you may ask? Probably because just because the far right says he is breaking the law doesn't mean he is.

Posted 255 days ago.

h ttp://dailycaller.c om/2014/02/11/report-95-percent-of-global-warming-models-are-wrong/

" Environmentalists and Democrats often cite a “97 percent” consensus among climate scientists about global warming. But they never cite estimates that 95 percent of climate models predicting global temperature rises have been wrong."

Posted 255 days ago.

We sure have plenty of controversies to point at. And a lawless president.

We were told obamacare is the law, get used to it. The president keeps on unlawfully changing the law. When will he ever be impeached or punished? Charles Krauthammer correctly says it is like a banana republic.

Posted 256 days ago.

mythravere

Ithink I remembered what I asked you for.

But my last post still stands.

That CBO thing is just another in a long line of things conservatives like to point their fingers at. Just another controversy.

Posted 256 days ago.

Myth,you can't even remmber what you ask for. I was simply answering your demand that I cite the source for my statement that this administration says it is good for people to not have jobs.

I did as you asked, and then you make fun of me for doing it. In the future you can do your own research. Yeah, right.

Posted 257 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! Ithink you need to pay attention better.

I don't like Obamacare myself so using that CBO thing as a little tit for tat point is just a waste of time.

Posted 257 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or